检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张盼 ZHANG Pan(Xinjiang Branch of Beijing Environment Co.,Ltd.,Urumqi 831400,China)
机构地区:[1]北京环境有限公司新疆分公司,乌鲁木齐831400
出 处:《黑龙江环境通报》2024年第10期54-56,共3页Heilongjiang Environmental Journal
摘 要:本文探讨了垃圾焚烧发电厂废渣的资源化处理方法,比较了物理处理和化学处理2种技术在废渣资源化方面的效果。物理处理和化学处理各进行了10组平行试验,根据实验结果评估了这2种方法在处理效率、金属和非金属物质的回收量等方面的效果。结果表明,虽然物理处理在操作方面具有优势,但在金属回收效率上略逊于化学处理。另一方面,化学处理虽然在提取细微金属颗粒方面效果更佳,但成本较高。本研究可为垃圾焚烧发电厂废渣的资源化处理提供科学依据。This study investigates the resource utilization methods for waste residues generated by waste-to-energy incineration plants,and compares the effectiveness of physical and chemical treatment technologies in the resource recovery of these residues.Ten sets of parallel experiments were conducted for both physical and chemical treatments,and the outcomes were assessed based on processing efficiency and the recovery rates of metals and non-metals.The results show that although physical treatment offers operational benefits,it is less efficient in metal recovery compared to chemical treatment.On the other hand,while chemical treatment is more effective in extracting fine metal particles,it is associated with higher costs.This research provides a scientific foundation for the resource utilization of waste residues from waste-to-energy incineration plants.
分 类 号:X705[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.43.16