论“良序科学”哲学基础的双重理论视野  

The Dual Theoretical Perspective on the Philosophical Foundation of“Well-Ordered Science”

作　　者：冯超 王骏 FENG Chao;WANG Jun(Department of Philosophy,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系,北京100871

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2024年第5期101-107,共7页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

摘　　要：“良序科学”是实现科学实践治理高效运作的理想化方案,关于其哲学基础的讨论则是论证科学良序化的题中应有之义。科学实践体现着社会历史性的构境,多重主体参与其中,形成异质且复杂的关系网络空间,科学目标、科学进步的划定都受其影响、被其形塑。文章从生成逻辑的解释向度出发,认为“良序科学”的哲学基础体现在两重理论视野上,即认知规范性尺度和科学民主化理想图景。这两重视野在论证环节上相互平行,具有各自的论述空间,最终统一于“科学实现良序化”的理论表达。文章最后对“良序科学”塑造的新科学哲学图景作出评价。Well-ordered science is an idealized solution for the efficient operation of science practice governance,and the discussion of its philosophical foundation aims to demonstrate that how science is well-ordered.Science practice embodies the social and historical situating,with multiple agents involved,forming a heterogeneous and complex network space of relationships.The delineation of scientific goals and scientific progress is influenced and shaped by this context.Based on the explanatory dimension of generative logic,this article argues that the philosophical foundation of“well-ordered science”is reflected in the dual theoretical perspectives,namely the scale of the epistemic normativity and an idealized vision of the democratization of science.These dual perspectives run parallel in the argumentation,have their respective discourse spaces,and ultimately converge in the theoretical expression of“how science is well-ordered”.In the end,the article evaluates the new picture of philosophy of science shaped by“well-ordered science”.

关 键 词：良序科学 温和科学实在论 最小化社会认识论 科学民主化 科学进步 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]