《词体明辨》“列体无序”辨  

Rebuttal of“Disordered Style”in Ci Ti Ming Bian

作　　者：彭哲 PENG Zhe(College of Art and Literature,Shihezi University,Shihezi Xinjiang 832003,China)

机构地区：[1]石河子大学文学艺术学院,新疆石河子832003

出　　处：《南阳师范学院学报》2024年第6期38-43,共6页Journal of Nanyang Normal University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“民国词律批评理论研究”(21BZW109)。

摘　　要：徐师曾《词体明辨》的列体顺序是“以字数多寡为序”,并非如万树和四库馆臣所驳之“不拘字数之多寡”“皆出臆定”。万树对《词体明辨》列体体例进行批驳的原因主要是出自他对“第一体”“第二体”体例存在等级秩序的误解及在这种误解下“以时代为序”学理基础的不足。除此之外,亦有来自现实方面的原因,如《填词图谱》和时人创作对“第一体”“第二体”等级秩序的强化。实际上,《词体明辨》之列体体例在词谱史上有权舆之地位,它一方面是万树《词律》“又一体”体例形成的源头,另一方面也确立了《钦定词谱》以前词体无“正”的词谱学理念,对清代词谱学的发展意义重大。The order of arrangement in Xu Shizeng’s Ci Ti Ming Bian is“based on the number of characters”,not as refuted by Wan Shu and Si Ku Guan Chen as“not limited to the number of characters”.The main reason why Wan Shu criticized the style of the Ci Ti Ming Bian is due to his misunderstanding of the hierarchical order of the“first body”and“second body”styles,as well as the insufficient theoretical foundation of“chronological order”under this misunderstanding.In addition,there are also reasons from practical aspects,such as the strengthening of the hierarchical order of“the first body”and“the second body”in the Tian Ci Tu Pu and some contemporary creations.In fact,the style of Ci Ti Ming Bian has a prominent position in the history of Ci genealogy.On the one hand,it is the source of the formation of the“integrated”style of Wanshu’s Ci Lv,and on the other hand,it also establishes the concept of Ci genealogy that there was no“correct”style of Ci before the Qinding Ci Pu,which is of great significance for the development of Ci genealogy in the Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：徐师曾 《文体明辨》 《词体明辨》 词谱 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]