检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于文轩[1,2] 宁天琦 Yu Wenxuan;Ning Tianqi(China University of Political Science and Law,Civil Commercial and Economical Law School,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院 [2]中国政法大学生态与资源法治研究中心,北京100088 [3]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《湖北社会科学》2024年第7期123-132,共10页Hubei Social Sciences
基 金:司法部2019年度国家法治与法学理论研究重点项目“生态文明建设法治保障研究”(19SFB1010)。
摘 要:公私协同应当作为气候治理的基本模式和气候法治遵循的制度逻辑。这不仅是实现碳达峰碳中和目标的必然路径,也是构建气候变化适应型制度体系的内在需求,还是气候法治公私交融属性的重要体现。在气候法治的公私协同模式中,各主体应当基于商谈理性实现互动,以气候信息为节点构建风险应对体系。在具体机制构建层面,气候法治体系应当结合公私协同模式的体系特征,从主体、治理框架和法秩序三个层面体现公私协同的制度逻辑,即以协同共治为基底构建主体决策机制,以信息沟通为核心构建治理框架,以公私法协同为线索构建气候法秩序。Public-private collaboration should be regarded as the fundamental model of climate governance and the institutional logic of climate rule of law.This approach is not only an inevitable path to achieving the Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality goals but also requirements for improving the adaptation measures and for integrating public and private attributes in climate rule of law.With the public-private collaboration,all entities should act based on discourse rationality based on a risk response system with climate information as“node”.The climate legal system should reflect the institutional logic of public-private collaboration in three aspects:subjects,governance framework and legal order.That is,to promote the decision-making mechanism based on collaborative co-governance,to establish a framework based on sufficient information communication,and to create a climate law order through the coordination between public and private laws.
分 类 号:D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222