检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨松 周旭 刘敬禹 王立辉 聂文 宋海涛 刘艳 陈森 YANG Song;ZHOU Xu;LIU Jingyu;WANG Lihui;NIE Wen;SONG Haitao;LIU Yan;CHEN Sen(Department of Neurosurgery,Jiaozhou Branch,Dongfang Hospital,Tongji University,Qingdao,Shandong 266300,China;Department of Intervention,Jiaozhou Branch,Dongfang Hospital,Tongji University,Qingdao,Shandong 266300,China)
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属东方医院胶州医院神经外科,山东青岛266300 [2]同济大学附属东方医院胶州医院介入导管室,山东青岛266300
出 处:《中华神经外科疾病研究杂志》2024年第5期45-48,共4页Chinese Journal of Neurosurgical Disease Research
基 金:青岛市中医药科技重点项目(2023-zyyz09);青岛市医药卫生科研指导项目:(2023-WJZD048)。
摘 要:目的对比EmboTrapⅡ支架与Solitaire FR支架在颅内动脉取栓中的差别。方法回顾性分析同济大学附属东方医院胶州医院66例急性脑栓塞患者,根据术中使用支架分为EmboTrapⅡ支架组及Solitaire FR支架组,对两组患者手术时间及一次性再通率和预后进行对比。结果EmboTrapⅡ支架组在手术操作难度、预后上与Solitaire FR支架组无统计学差异,但是可以大大提高一次取栓再通率并缩短手术时间。结论EmboTrapⅡ支架在颅内动脉取栓中可以大大缩短手术时间,提高一次取栓再通率。Objective To compare the differences between the EmboTrapⅡstent and Solitaire FR stent in intracranial artery thrombectomy.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 66 patients with acute cerebral embolism in Jiaozhou Branch,Dongfang Hospital,Tongji University.According to the use of stents during surgery,they were divided into the EmboTrapⅡstent group and the Solitaire FR stent group.The surgical time,onetime recanalization rate,and prognosis of the two groups were compared.Results The EmboTrapⅡstent group had almost no difference in surgical difficulty and prognosis compared to the Solitaire FR stent group,but it could greatly improve the rate of one-time thrombectomy and recanalization,and shorten the surgical time.Conclusions The EmboTrapⅡstent can greatly shorten the surgical time and improve the recanalization rate during intracranial artery thrombectomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185