2017—2021年合肥市公共场所卫生行政处罚案件分析  

Analysis of public place health administrative punishment cases in Hefei,China,2017-2021

作　　者：张庆枝 王勇 ZHANG Qing-zhi;WANG Yong(Hefei Municipal Health Commission Comprehensive Law Enforcement Supervision Institute,Hefei 230092,China)

机构地区：[1]合肥市卫生健康委员会综合执法监督所,合肥230092

出　　处：《环境卫生学杂志》2024年第10期871-876,共6页JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE

摘　　要：目的分析2017—2021年合肥市公共场所卫生行政处罚特点。方法对国家卫生健康监督信息平台中2017—2021年5年期间合肥市1286件公共场所案件的个案信息及国家双随机监督数据进行数据统计分析。结果2017—2021年合肥市公共场所查处率4.43%,5年差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=155.57,P<0.001);美容美发场所、沐浴场所、商场超市、文化娱乐场所、游泳场所、住宿场所6类场所案件查处率差异具有统计学意义(χ^(2)=421.59,P<0.001);案件主要来源于日常监督管理,且每年的构成比均在89%以上;国家双随机监督检查案件查处率呈逐年增高趋势(χ^(2)=58.03,P<0.001),双随机监督检查2017—2021年5年查处率为6.58%,与非双随机监督检查比较,差异具有统计学意义(χ^(2)=47.77,P<0.001)。处罚以一般程序为主。处罚种类以警告+罚款为主;案由主要以健康合格证和卫生许可证两证违法为主,占55.69%。2017—2021年5年内多次被处罚的主体占11.41%,以沐浴场所为主,占16.83%。结论合肥市公共场所案件主要来源于日常卫生监督管理,双随机查处率高,六类场所中以游泳场所和住宿场所违法行为高发,处罚种类单一,处罚金额、案由覆盖率不高。Objective To analyze the characteristics of public place health administrative punishment cases in Hefei,China from 2017 to 2021.Methods The information of 1286 public place health administrative punishment cases in Hefei from 2017 to 2021 and the data of national double random supervision and inspection in the National Health Surveillance Information Platform were used for statistical analysis.Results The five-year investigation rate of cases in public places in Hefei was 4.43%,and the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=155.57,P<0.001).The investigation rates of cases in beauty salons,bathing places,shopping malls and supermarkets,cultural and entertainment places,swimming pools,and hotels were significantly different(χ^(2)=421.59,P<0.001).The cases mainly came from daily supervision and management,which accounted for more than 89%of the cases each year.The investigation rate of national double random supervision and inspection cases increased year by year(χ^(2)=58.03,P<0.001).The five-year investigation rate was 6.58% for national double random supervision and inspection cases,which was significantly different from other cases(χ^(2)=47.77,P<0.001).The punishment was mainly based on general procedures.The types of punishment mainly included warning+fine.Additionally,55.69% cases involved violations in hygiene license and health certificates.Moreover,11.41%of the subjects were punished multiple times within five years,mainly in bathing places,accounting for 16.83%.Conclusion The cases mainly came from daily health supervision and management.The investigation rate was high for national double random supervision and inspection cases.Among the six types of places,swimming pools and hotels showed high incidence of illegal activities.Limited types of punishments were used with low fine and coverage of causes of action.

关 键 词：公共场所 行政处罚 特点 

分 类 号：R12[医药卫生—环境卫生学]