检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Shixi Yang Liping Zhang Xiwen Gu Weidi Huang
机构地区:[1]State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power&Mechatronic Systems,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China [2]School of Mechanical Engineering,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China
出 处:《Journal of Dynamics, Monitoring and Diagnostics》2024年第3期180-189,共10页动力学、监测与诊断学报(英文)
基 金:supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province(Grant No.2023C01248,2023C01069)and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.52375135,52305137).
摘 要:The reliability of the eddy current testing (ECT) in flaw detection is quantitatively evaluated by theprobability of detection (POD). Precise and efficient modeling of POD gives direction for the implement of ECTon sites to avoid false or missing flaw detection. Traditional POD analysis focuses on single uncertain factor orsingle response signal with limited credibility in engineering. This paper considers multiple response signals andmultiple flaw parameters to perform POD. The flaw length, the flaw depth, the coil impedance, and the magneticflux density are comprehensively studied under various lift-off distances. A finite element model (FEM) of ECT isestablished and verified with experiments to obtain sufficient simulation data for discrete POD modeling. Thecontinuous POD function is then fitted based on the discrete values to show the superiority of integrating multiplefactors. A comparison with conventional POD analysis further demonstrates the higher reliability of ECT flawdetection considering multiple flaw parameters and multiple response signals, especially for small flaws.
关 键 词:Eddy current testing finite element model multiple response signals probability of detection
分 类 号:O313[理学—一般力学与力学基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7