“动+在+宾_(L)”与“动+到+宾_(L)”的位移表达及认知建构差异  

“Verb+Zai(在)+Object_(L)”and“Verb+Dao(到)+Object_(L)”:Motion Expression and Cognitive Construction Differences

作　　者：顾龙飞[1] 唐厚广[1] GU Long-fei;TANG Hou-guang(School of Liberal Arts,Liaoning University,Shenyang Liaoning 110136,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学文学院,沈阳110136

出　　处：《语言研究》2024年第4期1-9,共9页Studies in Language and Linguistics

基　　金：辽宁省教育厅2021年度科学研究项目“位移事件视域下汉语动介构式与动词双向互动的认知研究”(LJKR0060)。

摘　　要：“动+在+宾_(L)”和“动+到+宾_(L)”的准入动词有不同的语义偏向特点,可表达的现实位移类型有同有异。二者都可表达瞬间延伸/非延伸路径位移。不同之处体现在隐现位移和持续延伸路径位移的表达上,“动+在+宾_(L)”与前者的关联度强,“动+到+宾_(L)”与后者的关联度强。以上异同均与二者对位移事件的认知建构方式有关。“动+在+宾_(L)”是认知主体通过对比物体发生位移前后两个时间点所处的不同位置完成对位移事件的识解的,位移路径不在基体当中。“动+到+宾_(L)”是认知主体通过对物体经过的空间位置进行逐一扫描与比较完成对位移事件的识解的,位移路径包含在基体当中。This paper points out that the admittance verbs of “Verb + Zai(在) + Object_(L)” and “Verb + Dao(到)+ Object_(L)” have different semantic preferences, and they can express both similar and different types of motion events. Both constructions can express instantaneous extended-path motion and non-extended-path motion. The difference lies in the expression of appearing/disappearing events and continuous extended-path motion, where “Verb + Zai(在) + Object_(L)” is more closely associated with the former and “Verb + Dao(到) + Object_(L)” is more closely associated with the latter. These similarities and differences are related to their cognitive construction of motion events. “Verb + Zai(在) + Object_(L)” involves the cognitive subject's understanding of the motion events by comparing the different positions of the object before and after the movement, with the motion path not included in the base. “Verb + Dao(到) + Object_(L)” involves the cognitive subject's understanding of the motion events by scanning and comparing the spatial positions that the object has passed through, with the motion path included in the base.

关 键 词：“动+在+宾_(L)” “动+到+宾_(L)” 位移事件 认知建构 近义构式 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]