困境与破局:再论主先客辅的折衷目的解释方法立场  

Dilemmas and Breakdowns:Re-discussing Eclectic Purpose Interpretation Methods and Positions in the Background of Subjective Goal Priority to the Objective Goal

作　　者：王子方 樊晓磊[1] Wang Zifang;Fan Xiaolei(Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou,Henan 450046)

机构地区：[1]河南财经政法大学,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2024年第3期32-40,共9页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

基　　金：2022年度河南省软科学重点项目“习近平法治思想引领法治河南建设实践研究”(222400410024);2022年河南省哲学社科规划项目“智能社会数据权利体系建设的公法治理研究”(2022BFX007)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在利益法学背景下,目的解释方法为法律解释体系中的“桂冠”,而目的解释方法的主客观说适用抉择一直是该解释方法的争议核心。所有的理论争议都会是实践中的“绊脚石”,故急需将主客观学说中的观点予以扬弃,并提出新的折衷调适立场——主观目的优先兼顾客观目的立场。以目的解释方法为基础,阐述目的解释的概念与“目的”复杂性,通过对传统主客观目的说之争论进行分析与辨明,指出目的解释在司法裁判中适用主观目的优先的目的解释立场能达到一个较符合法律目的的效果,以便法官在裁判案件过程中更加全面、高效地理解与解释法律,确保法治、公正、秩序等价值的实现。Under the background of interest jurisprudence,the method of objective interpretation is the crown in the system of legal interpretation,and the choice of subjective and objective theory is the core of the controversy of the method.All the theoretical disputes will be"stumbling blocks"in practice,so it is urgent to sublate the viewpoints in the subjective and objective theory and put forward a new compromise position-the subjective goal gives priority to the objective goal position.Based on the method of purpose interpretation,this paper expounds the concept of purpose interpretation and the complexity of "purpose".Through analyzing and distinguishing the traditional subjective and objective purpose theory,it points out that the purpose interpretation can achieve an effect in line with the legal purpose by applying the subjective purpose priority position in judicial judgment.So that judges can understand and interpret the law more comprehensively and efficiently in the process of adjudicating cases,and ensure the realization of the values of rule of law,justice and order.

关 键 词：目的解释方法 传统主客观说 主观目的优先 法治 

分 类 号：DF03[政治法律—法学理论]