检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔智淼 陈占[1] 刘军[1] 林瑞敏 李天润 Cui Zhimiao;Chen Zhan;Liu Jun(Department of Vascular Surgery,Beijing Haidian Hospital,Beijing 100080,China)
机构地区:[1]北京市海淀医院血管外科,北京100080 [2]北京大学第三医院介入血管外科,北京100191
出 处:《中国微创外科杂志》2024年第10期657-661,共5页Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨超声引导射频消融联合泡沫硬化剂注射治疗原发性小隐静脉曲张的有效性和安全性。方法对2021年11月~2022年11月我科46例原发性小隐静脉曲张进行回顾性分析,由患者选择手术方式,行射频消融联合硬化剂注射(观察组)和小隐静脉高位结扎剥脱(对照组)各23例。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、静脉临床严重程度评分(Venous Clinical Severity Score,VCSS)、并发症、治疗满意度和复发情况。结果与对照组相比,观察组手术时间短[(56.1±6.0)min vs.(81.7±10.6)min,t=-10.128,P=0.000],出血量少[(27.0±4.1)ml vs.(41.4±4.8)ml,t=-11.016,P=0.000],住院时间短[(2.0±0.7)d vs.(5.6±0.9)d,t=-14.319,P=0.000],术后3、6、12个月VCSS评分低[(7.4±2.0)分vs.(8.9±2.5)分,t=-2.165,P=0.036;(5.3±1.8)分vs.(6.5±2.2)分,t=-2.149,P=0.037;(2.6±1.3)分vs.(4.0±1.8)分,t=-2.912,P=0.006],满意度高(满意、基本满意、不满意观察组为18、4、1例,对照组为8、10、5例,Z=-2.967,P=0.003)。2组术后并发症发生率及术后12个月复发率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论超声引导射频消融联合泡沫硬化剂注射治疗原发性小隐静脉曲张是安全、有效的。Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation combined with foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein varicosities.Methods A total of 46 patients with primary small saphenous vein varicosities in our department from November 2021 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.Depending on the patient’s choice of surgical method,they underwent radiofrequency ablation combined with sclerotherapy(observation group,n=23)or high ligation and stripping of the saphenous vein(control group,n=23).The surgical time,intraoperative blood loss,length of hospital stay,postoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score(VCSS),incidence of postoperative complications,treatment satisfaction,and recurrence were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the control group,the observation group had shorter surgical time[(56.1±6.0)min vs.(81.7±10.6)min,t=-10.128,P=0.000],less intraoperative blood loss[(27.0±4.1)ml vs.(41.4±4.8)ml,t=-11.016,P=0.000],shorter hospitalization time[(2.0±0.7)d vs.(5.6±0.9)d,t=-14.319,P=0.000],lower VCSS scores at 3,6,and 12 months after surgery[(7.4±2.0)points vs.(8.9±2.5)points,t=-2.165,P=0.036;(5.3±1.8)points vs.(6.5±2.2)points,t=-2.149,P=0.037;(2.6±1.3)points vs.(4.0±1.8)points,t=-2.912,P=0.006],higher satisfaction[satisfied,somewhat satisfied,dissatisfied in 18,4,and 1 cases in the observation group and 8,10,and 5 cases in the control group,respectively,Z=-2.967,P=0.003].There were no statistically significant differences in the complication incidence and recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation combined with foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein varicosities is safe and effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.123.168