检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨博文 梁修仁 秦明广 曹英健 熊航 展茗[1] YANG Bo-Wen;LIANG Xiu-Ren;QIN Ming-Guang;CAO Ying-Jian;XIONG Hang;ZHAN Ming(College of Plant Science and Technology,Huazhong Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology,Ecology and Tillage in the Mid-dle Reach of Yangtze River,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Wuhan 430070,Hubei,China;Guangxi Eco-engineering Vocational and Technical College,Liuzhou 545004,Guangxi,China;College of Economics and Management,Huazhong Agricultural University/Macro-agricultural Research Institute,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,Hubei,China)
机构地区:[1]华中农业大学植物科学技术学院/农业农村部长江中游作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,湖北武汉430070 [2]广西生态工程职业技术学院,广西柳州545004 [3]华中农业大学经济管理学院/华中农业大学宏观农业研究院,湖北武汉430070
出 处:《作物学报》2024年第11期2801-2817,共17页Acta Agronomica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31871579,31571622)资助。
摘 要:长江中游地区是我国典型水旱轮作区,合理评价不同水旱轮作模式的生态经济效益对推动该区稻田可持续生产具有重要意义。本研究选取玉米-晚稻(MR)、油菜-中稻(RR)和小麦-中稻(WR)3种水旱轮作模式,对比其在秸秆还田(S+)与秸秆不还田(S–)处理下的作物产量、能量效率和碳效率等方面的差异。结果表明:(1)MR模式作物产量较RR和WR模式显著高22.25%和14.81%。秸秆还田显著提高MR、RR和WR模式作物产量7.12%、6.54%和6.43%。(2)MR模式光能利用率和产投比均显著高于RR与WR模式,耗能强度显著低于RR和WR模式。秸秆还田显著提高MR、WR模式光能利用率和RR、WR模式耗能强度,显著降低MR、RR和WR模式产投比。(3)MR模式碳生产效率和碳生态效率显著高于RR和WR模式。秸秆还田显著提高了MR、RR和WR模式碳生产效率和碳生态效率。(4)MR模式碳足迹显著低于RR和WR模式。秸秆还田显著降低了MR、RR和WR模式碳足迹。综上,与油菜-中稻和小麦-中稻模式相比,玉米-晚稻模式具有较高的作物产量、能量效率、碳效率和较低的碳足迹;秸秆还田利于提高作物产量,同时提高了各模式能量效率和碳效率,降低了碳足迹。可见,玉米-晚稻水旱轮作配合秸秆还田具有较好的生态经济效益,可作为长江中游水旱轮作区一种可持续生产技术。Upland-paddy rotations play a vital role in the middle Yangtze River region of China.It is crucial to rationally evaluate the environmental and economic benefits of different crop rotation patterns for sustainable crop production.This study investigated three upland-paddy rotations:maize-rice(MR),rapeseed-rice(RR),and wheat-rice(WR),to assess crop yields,energy efficiency,and carbon efficiency under two treatments:straw return(S+)and straw clearance(S–).The results revealed that the MR rotation had a significant increase in yield,with 22.25%and 14.81%higher yields compared to RR and WR,respectively.Incor-porating straw return led to a significant improvement in crop yield for MR,RR,and WR,with increases of 7.12%,6.54%,and 6.43%,respectively.Furthermore,the MR pattern exhibited significantly higher radiation energy utilization efficiency(RUE)and output/input ratio(O/I)compared to RR and WR,with significantly lower energy consumption intensity(EI).Straw return im-proved RUE for MR and WR,increased EI for RR and WR,and decreased O/I across all patterns.Additionally,carbon production efficiency and carbon ecological efficiency were significantly higher for MR compared to RR and WR.Straw return significantly improved efficiencies in all patterns.Moreover,the carbon footprint(CF)of MR was significantly lower than that of RR and WR,and straw return also reduced CF significantly in all patterns.Overall,the study results demonstrate that the MR rotation has higher crop yield,energy efficiency,carbon efficiency,and lower CF.Additionally,straw return can increase crop yield,improve energy efficiency and carbon efficiency,and reduce CF in all patterns.In conclusion,the maize-rice rotation with straw return can be considered a sustainable and beneficial technique for rice production in the middle Yangtze River region.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.36.197