《反分裂国家法》非和平方式条款的规范释义  

The Normative Interpretation of the Non-peaceful Terms of the Anti-Secession Law

作　　者：彭莉[1] 韩世鹏 PENG Li;HAN Shipeng

机构地区：[1]厦门大学台湾研究院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《台湾研究集刊》2024年第5期1-11,共11页Taiwan Research Journal

基　　金：2019年度国家社科基金一般项目“《反分裂国家法》的实施机制研究”(19BFX039)。

摘　　要：《反分裂国家法》是集反“台独”、反干涉、促和平于一体的法律,在“台独”分裂分子加紧勾连外部势力,谋求“渐进式台独”的新情势下,对《反分裂国家法》非和平方式条款进行解读具有现实意义,具体而言,实体要件方面,基于原则性与灵活性考量,需厘清“台独”分裂势力的内涵与边界,同时结合《反分裂国家法》第8条的法律文本,释明非和平方式及其他必要措施的启动要件;程序要件方面,立足《中华人民共和国宪法》以及《中华人民共和国国防法》《中华人民共和国国家安全法》等军事法的体系解释,明确国务院、中央军事委员会应急处置权的联合属性,并强调中央军事委员会的主导地位。The Anti-Secession Law is a comprehensive legal framework that integrates anti-“Taiwan independence”,anti-interference,and peace promotion.In the new situation where the“Taiwan independence”separatists are stepping up efforts to connect with external forces and seek incremental“legal Taiwan independence”,it is of great practical significance to interpret the non-peaceful terms of the Anti-Secession Law.Regarding the substantive requirements,considering both principles and flexibility,it is necessary to clarify the connotation and boundaries of“Taiwan independence”separatist forces,and at the same time,refine the triggering conditions for non-peaceful provisions and other necessary measures based on the legal text of Article 8 of the Anti-Secession Law.Regarding procedural elements,based on the systematic interpretation of military power norms such as the Constitution,the National Defense Law,and the National Security Law,it is necessary to clarify the joint nature of the emergency response authority of the State Council and the Central Military Commission and emphasize the leading position of the Central Military Commission.

关 键 词：《反分裂国家法》 “台独”分裂势力 非和平方式 其他必要措施 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]