检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜语晨 Jiang Yuchen(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Soochow 215006)
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第19期47-50,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:互联网法院主要采用“集中管辖”的方式,同时适用民事诉讼管辖规则。由于互联网法院尚处于探索阶段,其在管辖规则上存在管辖范围与目标定位不符、受案标准不清、与传统民事诉讼管辖规则相冲突等问题,导致管辖争议时有发生。因此应当明确互联网法院专业化审判的目标定位,拓展管辖范围,明确受案标准,优化与传统民事诉讼管辖规则的衔接,以构建科学、完善的互联网法院管辖规则体系。Internet court mainly adopts the mode of“centralized jurisdiction”,and also applies civil litigation jurisdiction rules.Due to the fact that Internet court is still in the exploratory stage,there are some problems in its jurisdiction rules,such as inconsistent jurisdiction scope and target positioning,unclear standards of accepting case,and conflicts with the traditional civil litigation jurisdiction rules,resulting in jurisdictional disputes occur from time to time.Therefore,in order to build a scientific and perfect system of Internet court jurisdiction rules,it is necessary to clarify the target positioning of specialized trial of Internet court,expand the jurisdiction scope,clarify the standards of accepting case,and optimize the connection with traditional civil litigation jurisdiction rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63