检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲜魏 Xian Wei(Beihua University,Jilin 132013)
机构地区:[1]北华大学,吉林132013
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第19期55-58,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:近年来,电信网络诈骗及其关联犯罪呈井喷式增长,在认定主观“明知”的过程中,由于电信网络诈骗犯罪面临着证据收集难以及贯彻严惩犯罪刑事政策的需要,“列举+概括”与“综合认定”的推定规则由此确立。而在适用推定时依然面临着自由裁量权过大、降低证明标准、反驳权的行使缺乏明确规范指引等问题。对此,应通过强化裁判文书说理、创设推定规则以经验法则为参照、规范刑事推定的反驳程序三种方式来解决。In recent years,telecommunication network fraud and its related crimes have shown a spurt of growth,and in the process of determining subjective“knowing”,and due to the difficulty of evidence collection and the need to implement the criminal policy of severe punishment of crimes in telecommunication network fraud,the presumption rules of“enumeration+generalization”and“comprehensive determination”have been established.However,when applying the presumption,it still faces problems such as excessive discretion,lowering the standard of proof,and lack of clear normative guidelines for the operation of the right of rebuttal.In this regard,it should be solved by three ways:strengthening the reasoning of judgment documents,creating presumption rules with reference to empirical rules,and standardizing the rebuttal procedures for criminal presumptions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.72.54