The missing hydrogen ion,Part-3:Science and the human flaws that compromise it  

作　　者：Robert Robergs Bridgette O'Malley Sam Torrens 

机构地区：[1]School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences,Queensland University of Technology,Kelvin Grove,Queensland,4059,Australia

出　　处：《Sports Medicine and Health Science》2024年第2期193-199,共7页运动医学与健康科学（英文）

摘　　要：The purpose of this research was to use a historical method and core principles from scientific philosophy to explain why mistakes were made in the development of the lactic acidosis construct.On a broader scope,this research explains what science is,why some scientists despite good intention,often get it wrong,and why it takes so long(decades)to correct these errors.Science is a human behaviour that consists of the identification of a problem based on the correct application of prior knowledge,the development of a method to best resolve or test the problem,completion of these methods to acquire results,and then a correct interpretation of the results.If these steps are done correctly there is an increased probability(no guarantee)that the outcome is likely to be correct.Thomas Kuhn proposed that you can understand what science is from how it has been performed,and from his essays he revealed a very dysfunctional form of science that he called‘normal’(due the preponderance of its presence)science.Conversely,Karl Popper was adamant that the practice of‘normal’science revealed numerous flaws that deviate from fundamental principles that makes science,science.Collectively,the evidence reveals that within the sports medicine and health sciences,as with all disciplines,errors in science are more frequent than you might expect.There is an urgent need to improve how we educate and train scientists to prevent the pursuit of‘normal’science and the harm it imparts on humanity.

关 键 词：SCIENCE Scientific philosophy ‘Normal’science ANOMALY Paradigm 

分 类 号：R595[医药卫生—内科学]