检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Bryan Lim Ishith Seth Gabriella Bulloch Yi Xie David J Hunter-Smith Warren M Rozen
机构地区:[1]Department of Plastic Surgery,Peninsula Health,Melbourne 3199,Australia [2]Central Clinical School at Monash University,The Alfred Centre,Melbourne 3004,Australia [3]Faculty of Medicine and Surgery,The University of Melbourne 3053,Australia
出 处:《Plastic and Aesthetic Research》2023年第1期758-768,共11页整形与美容研究(英文版)
摘 要:This study evaluated three prominent Large Language Models(LLMs)-Google’s AI BARD,Bing’s AI,and ChatGPT-4 in providing patient advice for hand laceration.Five simulated patient inquiries on hand trauma were prompted to them.A panel of Board-certified plastic surgical residents evaluated the responses for accuracy,comprehensiveness,and appropriate sources.Responses were also compared against existing literature and guidelines.This study suggests that ChatGPT outperforms BARD and Bing AI in providing reliable,evidence-based clinical advice,but they still face limitations in depth and specificity.Healthcare professionals are essential in interpreting LLM recommendations,and future research should improve LLM performance by integrating specialized databases and human expertise to advance nerve injury management and optimize patient-centred care.
关 键 词:Artificial intelligence ChatGPT BARD Bings AI large language model nerve injury
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.39.144