想象的真实:冷战时期美国东南亚研究的反思与超越  

Imaginary Reality:Reflection and Transcendence of American Southeast Asian Studies During the Cold War

作　　者：刘琪[1] LIU Qi(Shanghai Academy of Clobal Governance and Area Studies,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 201620)

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学上海全球治理与区域国别研究院,上海201620

出　　处：《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第4期80-88,共9页Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：上海市教育委员会“曙光计划”(项目编号:23SG27)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本文是对美国冷战期间东南亚研究的反思性梳理,并由此探寻当下中国世界民族研究的知识进路。文章从美国区域研究的整体规划出发,对其东南亚研究进行了概述,并以人类学的东南亚研究为例,讨论其知识特色与知识缺陷,认为对文化、地方和日常的关注构成了美国东南亚人类学研究的特点,也使其能够对普泛化社会理论进行一定的反思,但其人类学的知识体系背后,仍蕴含着西方中心主义的假设,其价值观与方法论上的缺憾均很明显。当下我国展开的东南亚研究,当基于中国与东南亚的历史联结及“全球南方”在现代化进程中面临的共同议题,实现对此前西方知识体系的超越。This paper is a reflective review of the American study of Southeast Asia during the Cold War.It aims to explore the knowledge approach of current China's world ethnic studies.This article starts from the overall planning of American regional research,and makes an overview introduction of Southeast Asian research,and takes the Southeast Asian research of anthropology as an example to discuss its knowledge characteristics and knowledge defects.This article points out that the cultural,local and everyday attention constitutes the characteristics of the American anthropological research in Southeast Asia,and also enables it to reflect on the general social theory.However,behind its anthropological knowledge system,there is still the hypothesis of western centralism,and the defects of its values and methodology are obvious.The current Southeast Asian research in China should base on the historical connection between China and Southeast Asia,and the common issues faced by the“Global South”in the process of modernization,so as to realize the transcendence of the previous western knowledge system.

关 键 词：世界民族 东南亚 人类学 全球南方 自主知识体系 

分 类 号：G119[文化科学]