西尔斯案与20世纪80年代以来美国女性主义史学  

The Sears Case and Shaping American Feminist Historiography Since the 1980s

作　　者：林漫 Lin Man

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学历史文化与旅游学院

出　　处：《历史研究》2024年第7期144-166,M0006,M0007,共25页Historical Research

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“美国马克思主义女性主义史学思想研究”(23CSS022)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：西尔斯案是20世纪80年代美国最具代表性的性别歧视诉讼之一。两位妇女史家爱丽丝·凯斯勒-哈里斯和罗萨琳·罗森博格分别代表控辩双方一一美国平等就业机会委员会和西尔斯百货公司出庭,对美国妇女就业历史作出截然不同的诠释。该案引起妇女史界广泛关注。控方的败诉引发美国学界对史家公共责任的探讨,以及对妇女与性别史研究长达几十年持续不断的反思,体现了美国女性主义史家对性别关系的新思考。西尔斯案的史学反思助推性别史兴起,是美国第二波女权运动转入第三波的催化剂。The Sears case stands out as one of the most significant gender discrimination lawsuits in the United States during the 1980s.Female historians Alice Kessler-Harris and Rosalind Rosenberg represented the prosecution and defense,namely the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Sears Department Store,providing starkly contrasting interpretations of American women's employment history.The case quickly gained considerable attention within the field of women's history.The prosecution's loss sparked a conversation in the American academic community about historians'public duties and led to a sustained examination of women's and gender history over the years,highlighting the evolving thoughts of American feminist historians concerning gender relations.The historical reassessment of the Sears case has not only propelled the field of gender history forward but also sparked the shift in the American feminist movement from its second wave to the third.

关 键 词：西尔斯案 妇女史 性别史 女性主义 多元文化主义 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]