“体制化能动”:国家定纷止争的本土实践逻辑  

“Activism within Institutional Systems”:The Practical Logic of State Dispute Resolution

作　　者：汪广龙 杜超峰 Guanglong Wang;Chaofeng Du

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学国际事务与公共管理学院

出　　处：《公共行政评论》2024年第5期104-123,198,199,共22页Journal of Public Administration

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“主动警务与重大突发事件中的违法犯罪防控”(20VYJ045)。

摘　　要：活力和秩序有机统一的必要前提,是构建国家秩序治理的边界,避免其对活力的“恣意”干预。现有理论将国家介入社会纠纷的边界诉诸于程序政治和形式理性,但该逻辑与转型中的治理现实存在明显断裂。论文发现,国家介入纠纷解决的本土实践,不是国家简单提升损益的干预力度和规则刚性,而是强调以行政统合全面吸纳诉求并构建整体同意;不是被动守住底线预期,而是通过形式法治主动嵌入社会,确保多元规则体系的整体可靠;不仅是从外部协助推进妥协与协商,更是以总体领导推动信任、交往与合作的良性循环。文章认为,这些多样和特殊的本土调适背后,呈现的是“体制化能动”的实践逻辑,这构成国家介入纠纷解决的清晰指引和可靠约束。For a dynamic yet orderly system to function effectively,it is crucial to clearly set the boundary of state interference.The existing literature ascribes the boundary to procedural politics and formal rationality.Yet it is unable to fully explain transitional China,s practice of state dispute resolution,which has three aspects.First,rather than turn to intensifying profit and loss interventions or rigid rule enforcement,state dispute resolution incorporates administrative integration to address demands and build consensus.Second,it not only safeguards basic expectations but also actively embeds formal legal principles into society to enhance the reliability of a diverse legal system.Finally,state dispute resolution moves beyond merely facilitating compromise and negotiation,instead it fosters trust,communication,and cooperation through hegemonic influence.The paper argues that the concept of "activism within the institutional system" represents the practical logic and stable boundary essential for effective local dispute resolution in transitional China.

关 键 词：活力与秩序 边界 纠纷解决 本土实践 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]