从《涧于日记》看张佩纶学术批评的特点  

The Characteristics of Zhang Peilun's Academic Criticism from Journal of Jian Yu

作　　者：柯亚莉[1] 高光新[2] KE Ya-li;GAO Guang-xin(Yanshan University Press,Qinhuangdao 066004,China;School of Chinese Language and Literature,Tangshan Normal University,Tangshan 063000,China)

机构地区：[1]燕山大学出版社,河北秦皇岛066004 [2]唐山师范学院文学院,河北唐山063000

出　　处：《唐山师范学院学报》2024年第5期1-5,25,共6页Journal of Tangshan Normal University

摘　　要：张佩纶《涧于日记》记载了大量的读书笔记和学术批评成果,其学术批评特点主要表现在:一是嗜博。张佩纶藏书丰富,读书广泛,治学也竭泽而渔式地搜集材料。无论汉学还是宋学,无论唐诗还是宋诗,他都是采取兼综博通的态度。二是求新。张佩纶在考证时,好为新奇之论,在某些问题上确有创见,但有欠精审。三是主观。张佩纶有着曲折的人生经历,他带着个人情感进行读书治学,因此得出的结论或多或少带有主观臆断的成分。Zhang Peilun's Journal of Jian Yu recorded a large number of reading notes and academic criticism achievements,and its academic criticism characteristics were mainly manifested in three aspects.The first was broad reading.Zhang Peilun had a rich collection of books,a wide range of reading,and also devoted himself to collecting materials for his academic pursuits.Whether it was Sinology or Song studies,whether it was Tang poetry or Song poetry,he adopted a comprehensive and comprehensive attitude.The second was seeking novelty.When Zhang Peilun was conducting research,he was very curious about his theories.Although he had some innovative ideas on certain issues,he lacked careful examination.The third was subjective.Zhang Peilun had a tortuous life experience,and he pursued his studies with personal emotions,so his conclusions were more or less subjective and speculative.

关 键 词：张佩纶 《涧于日记》 考证 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]