经济效率目标视阈下我国反垄断法中宽大制度的分析与完善  

Analysis and Improvement of Leniency System in China's Antitrust Law Based on Economic Efficiency Goal

作　　者：江书晔 JIANG Shuye(Dongshan Country People's Court,zhangzhou Fujian 363401,China)

机构地区：[1]福建省东山县人民法院,福建漳州363401

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2024年第9期104-111,共8页Journal of Leshan Normal University

摘　　要：垄断协议是反垄断法所规制的垄断行为之一。由于垄断协议的隐蔽性,各国反垄断法将宽大制度视为攻破垄断协议最有效的应对措施之一。然而,我国反垄断法中的宽大制度在当前实践中的威慑效果尚未得到充分发挥,常被束之高阁。经济效率目标作为我国反垄断中举足轻重的目标之一,与宽大制度之间亦存在千丝万缕的联系。为了纾解当前宽大制度在我国所存在的现实问题,有必要在经济效率目标视阈下,借鉴宽大制度发展较为成熟的美国和韩国的经验,探索我国宽大制度的完善路径,通过细化宽大制度申请主体范围,加大惩处力度,适当规范执法机构的自由裁量权,使制度得以回归到呼应时代需求的现实轨道中来,最终实现经济效率的提高。Monopoly agreements represent one of the monopoly behaviors governed by antitrust law.Given the inherent concealment associated with such agreements,many countries have identified the leniency system as one of the most effective strategies to combat them.However,the deterrent effect of the leniency system in China's antitrust law has not been fully exploited in current practice,and is often put on the shelf.The goal of economic efficiency,which is one of the most significant objectives of antitrust in China,is also inextricably linked to the leniency system.In order to address the current problems related to the system in China,it is necessary to learn from the United States and South Korea,where the leniency system is relatively mature.We should explore the path of improving the leniency system,refine the scope of applicants for the system,increase punishment intensity and appropriately regulate the discretion of law enforcement agencies to ensure that the system aligns with contemporary needs and ultimately enhances economic efficiency.

关 键 词：反垄断法 宽大制度 垄断协议 经济效率目标 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]