比较法视野下司法人工智能的多元演进  

Multi-evolution of Judicial Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Comparative Law

作　　者：陈柏志 CHEN Baizhi(School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《河北开放大学学报》2024年第5期83-85,共3页Journal of Hebei Open University

摘　　要：法律发达国家基于本国司法实际情况与功能定位发展出司法人工智能的不同样态。英国、美国、法国的司法人工智能,分别出于解决传统司法运行缓慢花费高昂问题、拓宽人工智能法律应用场景、加强司法数据公开等原因,推出了在线法院、量刑建议与预测正义等典型做法,但均受到各自司法制度的掣肘。人工智能在司法领域的引入非但不会改变一国司法的基本特征,反而会基于一国之司法背景,服务于司法运作,不断强化这一特征。我国司法人工智能建设应当发挥顶层设计的整合效应、试点—推广的改革逻辑和人民法院的政治定位等司法体制优势,在人工智能技术引入的基础上同时做到司法制度的因应变化。Legal developed countries have developed different forms of judicial artificial intelligence based on their actual judicial situation and functional orientation.Judicial artificial intelligence in Britain,the United States and France has introduced typical practices such as online court,sentencing suggestion and predictive justice for solving the problem of slow and expensive traditional judicial operation,broadening the legal application scenarios of artificial intelligence and strengthening the disclosure of judicial data,but they are all constrained by their respective judicial systems.The introduction of artificial intelligence in the judicial field will not change the basic characteristics of a country’s justice,but will serve the judicial operation based on a country’s judicial background and continuously strengthen this characteristic.The construction of judicial artificial intelligence in China should give full play to the advantages of judicial system,such as the integration effect of top-level design,the reform logic of pilot-popularization and the political orientation of people’s courts,and at the same time make the judicial system adapt to changes on the basis of the introduction of artificial intelligence technology.

关 键 词：司法人工智能 功能主义 比较法学 数字法院 

分 类 号：D926.1[政治法律—法学]