我国本科理学类专业认证标准建设的现状、分析和建议  

Current Situations,Analysis and Suggestions on the Accreditation Standards of Science Education in China

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王馥君 赵福利 陈敏[3] WANG Fujun;ZHAO Fuli;CHEN Min

机构地区:[1]中山大学教务部,广东广州510275 [2]中山大学物理学院,广东广州510275 [3]汕头大学,广东汕头515031 [4]北京师范大学教育学部,北京100875

出  处:《科教文汇》2024年第20期1-6,共6页Journal of Science and Education

基  金:广东省高等教育学会“十三五”规划2020年度高等教育研究重点课题“‘四新’建设背景下的本科教学质量评价指标体系与监测模型构建”(20GZD11)。

摘  要:我国理学类专业建设面临专业培养目标不够明确、培养特点不够突出,人文素养课程比重不高,专业课程设置不够灵活,师资队伍建设有待加强等现实问题。对比研究国外政府主导型、政府—组织联合型、社会主导型三种形态下的理学类专业建设标准,我国理学类专业认证标准应符合功能定位与实际应用,兼顾统一性与差异性,适应制度化与常态化。Continuous improvement of science education has become an important goal of the reform and innovation in all countries in the world.Science education in China is faced with practical problems as follows:the training goal is not clear enough;the cultivation characteristics are not prominent enough;the curriculum is not flexible enough.Comparing with three forms of the construction standard of science education abroad,the accreditation standards of science education in China should comply with followings:graded certification,quantitative standards combined with qualitative standards,general standards combined with professional standards,continuous improvement with closed-loop feedback.

关 键 词:专业认证 理学类专业 认证标准 质量保障 

分 类 号:G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象