检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Chittella Ravichandran Padmanaban Gopalakrishnan
出 处:《Energy and Built Environment》2024年第5期741-771,共31页能源与人工环境(英文)
摘 要:International Energy Agency(IEA)predicts India’s AC stock will reach 1144 million units by 2050,making it the second largest ACs holder globally.Studies on the effect of building geometry on cooling load reduction are primarily focused on material and envelope specifications.However,studies on building morphological parame-ters in the Indian context are scarce.Therefore,this research quantifies the effect of four morphology predictors,namely,FL(floor number),ESA(exposed surface area),CZB(conditioned zones per building),and CZF(con-ditioned zones per floor)on cooling load in 75 dominant residential built forms of Navi Mumbai.The selected buildings are simulated using the Rhinoceros 6 tool with the energy plus plugin.Despite having the same sim-ulation inputs,envelope parameters,and conditioned volume,the results indicated a 90%variation between the compact and loosely designed forms.Multiple Linear Regression shows that the four predictors explain 78%(R2=0.78)of variation in the cooling load.It is observed that tall buildings show greater efficiency in cooling load reduction due to lesser CZF values.Also,an increase in CZB and a decrease in ESA significantly reduce the mean cooling load due to compactness and wall sharing,respectively.
关 键 词:Building Geometry Navi Mumbai Cooling loads Simulation Multiple Linear Regression
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.144.240