许学夷《诗源辩体》的宋元诗评  

A Commentary on Poetries of Song and Yuan Dynasties in Xu Xueyi's Shiyuanbianti

作　　者：杨晖 欣城 Yang Hui;Xin Cheng(College of Humanities,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214122,Jiangsu,China;Literature Information Center,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]江南大学人文学院,江苏无锡214122 [2]复旦大学文献信息中心,上海200433

出　　处：《伊犁师范大学学报》2024年第3期64-69,共6页Journal of Yili Normal University

基　　金：2021年度江苏省社会科学基金重点项目“许学夷《诗源辩体》的原创性研究”(21ZWA003)。

摘　　要：晚明诗论家许学夷在其著作《诗源辩体》后集纂要卷一中补充了对宋元两朝诗歌的评价,但未得到学术界的关注。许学夷对宋元诗歌的整体评价不高,认为诗歌至晚唐已达到流变的极致,无法超越。他较为详细地论述了宋人梅尧臣和黄庭坚,认为二者诗歌虽有可取,亦多“怪恶”,是“变中之变”;元人侧重元好问和杨维桢,肯定二者在元代诗歌创作中的成就,但也指出其仍有“变多于正”的缺陷。许学夷的宋元诗论代表了晚明复古派对宋元诗的看法,也是他“复古崇正”思想的表现。Xu Xueyi,a poetical critic in the late Ming Dynasty,added his comments on the poetry of Song and Yuan Dynasties in Volume One of the sequel to Shiyuanbianti,but this did not receive much attention from the academic community.Xu Xueyi's general evaluation of the Song and Yuan dynasties'poetry is not high and he believed that poetry has reached the ultimate change in the late Tang Dynasty and can not be surpassed.He discusses Mei Yaochen and Huang Tingjian of the Song Dynasty in detail,and thinks that although their poems are desirable,they are also"strange and evil"and are"changes in changes".Xu Xueyi discussed the poets of the Yuan Dynasty,focusing on Yuan Haowen and Yang Weizhen.He affirmed their achievements in the creation of poetry in the Yuan Dynasty,but also pointed out their shortcomings of"more changes than compliance".Xu Xueyi's theory of Song and Yuan poetry repre-sents the views of the late Ming retro school on Song and Yuan poetry,and is also an expression of his"retro and compliance"ideology.

关 键 词：许学夷 《诗源辩体》 宋诗 元诗 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]