合意解除中“协商一致”的认定  

Determination of“Consensus”in Dissolution of Consensual Agreement

作　　者：肖涵宇 XIAO Hanyu(School of Law and Public Administration,Yibin University,Yibin,Sichuan 644000,China)

机构地区：[1]宜宾学院法学与公共管理学院,四川宜宾644000

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2024年第10期40-49,74,共11页Journal of Yibin University

基　　金：宜宾学院培育项目“监察下乡:基层监督赋能基层治理研究”(2023PY26)。

摘　　要：司法实践在合意解除是否需要对解除后果达成一致意见,受要约人能否以行为方式构成对合意解除承诺,以及双方无效行使解除权的行为能否转化为合意解除等方面,出现类案异判的现象。区分合意解除的必须条款和主要条款后,当事人必须在终止(原)合同的权利义务关系上达成一致才能发生解除效果,解除后果等主要但非必须条款可以由法律填补。但是,若要约包含解除后果,受要约人对解除后果的变更构成实质性变更。根据“要约-承诺”的一般规则,受要约人的行为能否构成承诺,应根据该行为能否让要约人产生信赖利益进行判断。基于意思自治,法院不应把双方无效行使解除权的行为转化为合意解除。In judicial practice,there are different cases in terms of whether it is necessary to reach an agree-ment on the consequences of rescission by consensual termination,whether the offeree can constitute an accep-tance of consensual termination by means of conduct,and whether the invalid exercise of the right of rescis-sion by both parties can be transformed into consensual termination.After distinguishing between the necessary clauses and the main clauses of consensual termination,the parties must reach an agreement on the rights and obligations of the termination contract before the rescission effect can occur,and the main but not essential clauses such as the consequences of rescission can be filled by law.However,if the offer includes a consequence of rescission,the change of the consequence of rescission by the offeree constitutes a material change.According to the general rule of“offer-acceptance”,whether the offeree's act constitutes an acceptance should be judged according to whether the act can give the offeror a trust interest.Based on autonomy of will,the court should not convert the invalid exercise of the right of rescission by both parties into consensual rescission.

关 键 词：合意解除 协商一致 信赖利益 解除后果 实质性变更 

分 类 号：DF525[政治法律—民商法学]