互惠式造血:社会组织筹集资金路径研究--基于北京市A社会工作机构的分析  

Reciprocal Hematopoiesis:Research on Path for Social Organizations Fund Raising:Based on Analysis of Beijing A Social Work Institution

作　　者：刘元圣 王斌 李棋 胡那苏图 LIU Yuansheng;WANG Bin;LI Qi;HU Nasutu(School of Ethnology and Anthropology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010022,China;Tencent Academician Expert Workstation,Beijing 100000,China;Beijing Putian Great Health Technology Development Co.,LTD,Bejing 100080,China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古师范大学民族学人类学学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010022 [2]腾讯院士专家工作站,北京100000 [3]北京普天大健康科技发展有限公司,北京100080

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2024年第10期75-82,共8页Journal of Yibin University

基　　金：内蒙古自治区教育科学研究“十四五”规划2023年度课题项目“‘情感—技术—文化’能力融合的社会工作教育理念研究”(NGJGH2023221);内蒙古师范大学研究生科研创新基金资助项目(TY20240019)。

摘　　要：我国社会组织筹集资金路径还未摆脱路径依赖的困境。以社会工作机构为代表的社会组织通过政府购买服务项目获得嵌入社区的“合法性”许可,在与商业机构的协同合作中创建“互惠式造血”模式,保证购买服务效果的前提下也实现了社会组织自我造血。“互惠式造血”模式对社会组织发展或具有借鉴意义,但是需厘清社区权力关系中的创新服务项目问题,以及同商业结构维持可持续性的协同关系的问题。At present,the fundraising path of China's social organizations has not effectively got rid of the di-lemma of path dependence.Social organizations represented by social work institutions have obtained the“le-gitimacy”permission embedded in the community through government purchase of service projects under the background of government procurement of services,and created a“reciprocal hematopoietic”model in col-laboration with commercial institutions,ensuring the effectiveness of government procurement of services.The"reciprocal hematopoietic"model has reference significance for the development of social organizations,but it is also necessary to clarify how to innovate service projects in community power relations,and how to maintain sustainable synergies with commercial structures.

关 键 词：社会组织 筹集资金 互惠式造血 创新社会治理 

分 类 号：C916[经济管理]