基于目标值的区域农业绿色发展评价研究——以浙江省衢州市为例  

Target-Based Evaluation of Regional Agriculture Green Development:Taking Quzhou City of Zhejiang Province as an Example

作　　者：徐霄 贾燕翔 管诗华 刘鹏祺 张卫峰[2,3] 朱齐超 XU Xiao;JIA Yanxiang;GUAN Shihua;LIU Pengqi;ZHANG Weifeng;ZHU Qichao(Beautiful Rural Construction Center of Quzhou,Quzhou Zhejiang 324003,China;College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China;National Academy of Agriculture Green Development,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China)

机构地区：[1]衢州市美丽乡村建设中心,浙江衢州324003 [2]中国农业大学资源与环境学院,北京100193 [3]中国农业大学国家农业绿色发展研究院,北京100193

出　　处：《生态经济》2024年第11期97-102,145,共7页Ecological Economy

基　　金：云南省重大科技专项计划“滇池流域农业绿色发展模式创新策略与实现途径”(202102AE090030);校地合作项目“碳账户核算及减排固碳技术研究”(衢农合2022-31)。

摘　　要：农业绿色发展是发展观的一场深刻革命。论文基于内涵认知,从粮食安全、资源节约、环境友好和生活富裕4个维度构建农业绿色发展指标体系并制定指标标准,以衢州市为对象,明确其农业绿色发展状况及提升方向。研究表明:(1)该市农业绿色发展指数(AGDI)快速上升,资源节约维度对AGDI增长贡献率(51.6%)最高,其次是环境友好维度(27.2%),生活富裕维度贡献率(2.1%)最低。(2)该市农业绿色发展水平已达到目标水平的82%,其AGDI高于国家平均水平(64.9分)26.3%。资源节约(98.7分)与环境友好(91.5分)维度评分最高,生活富裕(64.2分)维度评分最低。(3)正向发展指标平均为目标值的90%,而负向控制指标平均超出目标值48%。即“发展”良好,但“绿色”不足。整体而言,衢州市农业绿色发展已达到较高水平,但协调性不足,维度之间的协同发展与多目标的协同实现是未来工作的重点。Agriculture green development (AGD) is a profound revolution in the concept of development.Based on the connotation of AGD,this study constructs an indicator system with four dimensions of food security,resource conservation,environmental friendliness and social prosperity,including defined standards/threshold for 20 detailed indicators,and takes Quzhou City as an example,to quantify its status and improvement directions.The research found that:(1) The index of agriculture green development (AGDI) was rapidly growing during 2015-2019.The contribution of resource conservation dimension is the highest (51.6%),followed by the environmental friendliness dimension (27.2%),and the contribution of social prosperity dimension (2.1%) is the lowest.(2) The AGDI is 82% relative to the target value,which is 26.3% higher than the national average (64.9).In detail,the dimensions of resource conservation (98.7) and environmental friendliness (91.5) have the highest scores,while the dimensions of social prosperity (64.2) have the lowest scores.(3) From the perspective of specific indicators,the average of positive direction indicator is equivalent to 90% of the target values,while the average of negative direction indicators have exceeded the threshold by 48%.In short,the “development” indicators are good,but the “green” level is insufficient.In conclusion,the research indicates that Quzhou City has reached a relatively high level in AGD,but the synergistic among indicators is yet insufficient.The coordinating development among dimensions and co-realization of multiple goals are key in the future development.

关 键 词：农业绿色发展 指标体系 定量评价 目标值 协同发展 

分 类 号：F327[经济管理—产业经济] F062.2