论广义论证中语境对语言选择的制约性——从语用学的观点看  

On the Restraint of Context on Language Choice in Generalized Argumentation-From the Perspective of Pragmatics

作　　者：屈凯 Qu Kai(Institute of Logic and Cognition,Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学逻辑与认知研究所

出　　处：《科学．经济．社会》2024年第3期116-124,共9页Science Economy Society

摘　　要：从语用学的观点看,广义论证就是在现实的、具体的语境下,参与者不断做出语言选择的过程,说者选择语言表达意义,听者感知和推理对方想要表达的意义。参与者互动交际,交替作为说者和听者,各自处于论证的不同阶段,都要受到相关的语境因素的制约,各自的制约性有所不同,因而各自应对的原则也就不同。From the perspective of pragmatics,generalized argumentation is the process in which participants constantly make linguistic choices in a realistic and specific context.The speaker chooses some linguistic structures to express the meaning,and the listener perceives and deduces the meaning that the other party wants to express.Participants interact and communicate,alternately as speakers and listeners,each at different stages of the argumentation,are subject to the constraints of relevant contextual factors,and then,their constraints are different,so their principles of response are different.

关 键 词：广义论证 语言选择 顺应 关联 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]