机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学循证医学中心,北京市100029 [2]山东中医药大学附属医院 [3]山东中医药大学博士后流动站 [4]陕西中医药大学针灸推拿学院 [5]山西省中医院 [6]河南中医药大学第一附属医院 [7]澳大利亚西悉尼大学国家辅助医学研究院 [8]北京中医药大学房山医院
出 处:《中医杂志》2024年第19期1994-2001,共8页Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81830115)。
摘 要:目的 将用于测量患者对疗效预期的斯坦福治疗期望量表(SETS)进行汉化,形成中文版SETS(C-SETS),并初步评价C-SETS在肝郁脾虚证腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)患者中医治疗中应用的可行性和信度、效度。方法 获得SETS开发者授权,遵循“双向翻译”原则对SETS进行直译、回译,形成C-SETS。以96例肝郁脾虚证IBS-D患者为研究对象,在患者接受治疗前进行C-SETS问卷填写,采用问卷回收率、完成率及填写时间评估可行性;以克朗巴赫系数(Cronbach's α)评估信度;通过探索性及验证性因子分析进行结构效度检验,采用相关性分析对内容效度进行检验。结果 C-SETS共包含10个条目,其中第1、3、5个评分条目构成积极期望子量表,第2、4、6个评分条目构成消极期望子量表,每个评分条目均采用7等级李克特评分。C-SETS回收率为100%(96/96),完成率为89.58%(86/96);积极和消极治疗期望子量表的Cronbach's α分别为0.845和0.854;探索性因子分析显示,6个条目的共同性系数(共同度)均>0.4,且6个条目可以被两个因子解释总变异的77.092%;验证性因子分析显示,拟合优度指数、比较拟合指数、近似误差均方根、规范拟合系数、卡方自由度比取值分别为0.943、1.003、0、0.943、0.626;Spearman分析结果提示C-SETS具有较好的内容效度。结论 C-SETS具有良好的可行性和信度、效度,初步证明了其可作为肝郁脾虚证IBS-D患者接受中医治疗前治疗期望的评估工具。Objective To adapt the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale(SETS)into Chinese(C-SETS)and test the feasibility,validity and reliability of its application in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome(IBS-D)with liver-constraint and spleen-deficiency syndrome treated with traditional Chinese medicine(TCM).Methods We obtained authorisation from the developer of the SETS,and followed the principle of"two-way translation"to translate the SETS by literal translation and back translation to form the C-SETS.Ninety-six IBS-D patients with liver-constraint and spleen-deficiency syndrome were enrolled as respondents and filled out C-SETS before receiving treatment;the feasibility was assessed by the recall rate,completion rate and the duration of filling out the scale;the reliability was assessed by Cronbach'sα;the structural validity was assessed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis,and the content validity was assessed by correlation analysis.Results The C-SETS consists of 10 items,with the 1st,3rd,and 5th rating items constituting the Positive Expectations subscale,and the 2nd,4th,and 6th rating items constituting the Negative Expectations subscale,each of which is rated on a 7-point Likert Scale.The recall of C-SETS was 100%(96/96),the completion rate was 89.58%(86/96);Cronbach'sαfor the Positive and Negative Treatment Expectations subscales were 0.845 and 0.854,respectively;exploratory factor analysis showed that the coefficient of commonality for all six entries was larger than 0.4,and that the six entries could be used by both factors to explain 77.092%of the total variance;validation factor analysis showed that the goodness-of-fit index,comparative fit index,root mean square of approximation error,canonical fit coefficient,and chi-square degrees of freedom ratio took the values of 0.943,1.003,0,0.943,and 0.626,respectively;and the results of Spearman's analysis suggested that the C-SETS had good content validity.Conclusion The C-SETS has well feasibility,reliability,and validity,wh
关 键 词:斯坦福治疗期望量表 治疗期望 肠易激综合征 腹泻 肝郁脾虚证 信度 效度
分 类 号:R259[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...