检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋茂鑫 谢志杰[2] 刘飞 魏飞鸿 SONG Maoxin;XIE Zhijie;LIU Fei;WEI Feihong(Radiology Department,Zihe Meizhou Hospital,Meizhou,Guangdong 514000,China;Radiology Department,Meizhou People's Hospital,Meizhou,Guangdong 514000,China)
机构地区:[1]紫合梅州医院放射科,广东梅州514000 [2]梅州市人民医院放射科,广东梅州514000
出 处:《中国医学工程》2024年第10期30-33,共4页China Medical Engineering
摘 要:目的探究颈椎张口位、颈椎四位片X线摄影在颈椎病中的诊断价值。方法选取2021年1月至2022年12月在紫合梅州医院接受治疗的60例颈椎病患者,按排序法分为观察组和对照组,各30例。对照组患者采用颈椎张口位X线摄影,在此基础上,给予观察组颈椎四位片X线摄影,比较两组患者的影像学检查结果以及特异征象检出情况。结果观察组的椎间隙狭窄、颈椎曲度异常、椎体后缘骨赘检出率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但骨性椎管狭窄、钩突增生、小关节突增生检出率与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的特异征象检出率为33.33%(10/30),明显高于对照组[10.00%(3/30)](P<0.05);经检查结果显示,观察组的X线各动态指标检测率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论两种方法均能观察到颈椎病的大部分征象,但在不同的形态学检出率具有明显的限度,且两种方法的联合诊断准确度更高,临床上可将其联合应用,以便对颈椎病的影像学诊断结论作出客观评价。【Objective】To explore the diagnostic value of cervical opening position and cervical four position X-ray photography in cervical spondylosis.【Methods】Sixty patients with cervical spondylosis who received treatment in Zihe Meizhou Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and divided into an observation group and a control group according to sorting method,with 30 patients in each group.The patients in control group underwent cervical spine opening X-ray photography,and on this basis,the observation group was given four position cervical spine X-ray photography to compare the imaging examination results and specific sign detection of the two groups of patients.【Results】There was no significant difference in the detection rate of intervertebral space stenosis,cervical curvature abnormality,and vertebral posterior edge osteophyte between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05),but there was a statistical difference in the detection rate of bone spinal stenosis,structural process hyperplasia,and small articular process hyperplasia between the observation group and the control group(P<0.05).The detection rate of specific signs in the observation group was 33.33%(10/30),which was significantly higher than that in the control group[10.00%(3/30)],and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The examination results showed that the detection rate of various dynamic X-ray indicators in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).【Conclusion】Both methods can observe most of the symptoms of cervical spondylosis,but there are obvious limitations in different morphological detection rates,and the combined diagnostic accuracy of the two methods is higher.They can be combined in clinical practice to objectively evaluate the imaging diagnosis conclusions of cervical spondylosis.
分 类 号:R445[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7