《隋书·经籍志》对汉唐间杂史撰述的学术总结  

A Summary of Miscellaneous Histories between the Han and Tang Dynasties in the Jingjizhi of SUISHU

作　　者：郭栋 Guo Dong

机构地区：[1]湖北理工学院师范学院,湖北黄石435000

出　　处：《史学史研究》2024年第3期31-42,共12页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：国家社会科学基金“魏晋南北朝时期家史撰修及其叙事特征研究”(项目号:20BZS0005)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《隋书·经籍志》史部设立杂史二级类目,著录史家率尔而作,体制不经,内容芜杂的历史撰述71部,对汉唐间的杂史进行学术总结。此后,杂史成为古代文献书目常设类目。唐初史臣撰写《隋书·经籍志》时,清楚认识到杂史多为史家私人撰述,属辞比事与《春秋》有明显不同,撰史目的和撰述体裁体例与正史也有显著差异。这些杂史撰述不重视体裁体例和材料采择,撰述较为随意,内容多糅杂委巷之说,甚至把一些迂诞怪异之事掺入撰述之中,以致历代文献书目往往把杂史与小说相混。杂史虽然不是“史策之正”,不甚符合政治需要和道德要求,却仍然是史书,不是诸子中的杂家,也不是小说,具有一定的的史学价值。There is a sub-category, namely Miscellaneous History in the History Department of the Jingjizhi of SUISHU, encompassing 71 histories which had complicated system and content, most completed by historians casually. So it is a summary of miscellaneous histories between the Han and Tang Dynasties. Afterwards, the category of miscellaneous history became common in the ancient category. During the early Tang Dynasty, when historiographers compiled the Jingjizhi of SUISHU, they clearly realized that miscellaneous histories were mostly private works. There were obvious differences in terms of its compiling methods compared to that of the Spring and Autumn Annals. The purpose and genre of miscellaneous history also differed significantly from those of official history. The authors of these histories didn't attach importance to genre and sources, and were casual in their writing. The content is unreliable, and even some bizarre things are included in these books. Consequently, the miscellaneous history often mingles with fictions in some categories. Although miscellaneous history have some disadvantages, it is still historical book instead of novel.

关 键 词：《隋书·经籍志》 杂史 汉唐史学 汉唐学术 文史关系 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]