马佐里克对法国大革命传统史学的捍卫——以孚雷-索布尔论战为中心的考察  

Mazauric's Defence of the Classic Historiography of the French Revolution: Focus on the Controversy between Furet and Soboul

作　　者：周立红[1] Zhou Lihong

机构地区：[1]中山大学历史学系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《史学史研究》2024年第3期93-103,共11页Journal of Historiography

摘　　要：马佐里克是法国大革命传统史学的捍卫者。在那场著名的孚雷-索布尔论战中,作为索布尔的弟子,马佐里克最先站出来发表文章批判孚雷,随后又出版专著维护传统史学的观点。索布尔1982年去世后,马佐里克依然持久有力地反击孚雷的论点。马佐里克与孚雷的论争揭示了传统史学与修正史学在法国大革命一系列根本问题上的分歧,激发了革命史研究的活力。两派史学的价值和局限需要放到当代法国史学的动态发展中来审查。Claude Mazauric is a firm defender of the Classic Historiography of the French Revolution. In the famous controversy between Furet and Soboul, as a disciple of Soboul, Mazauric is the first historian who criticized openly Furet in his article, and then he published a book to defend systematically the viewpoint of the Classic Historiography. Even after Soboul's death in 1982, Mazauric counter attacked Furet's arguments lastingly and powerfully. The debate between Mazauric and Furet revealed the fundamental divergences between Classic Historiography and Revisionist Historiography on a series of issues related to the French Revolution, infusing vigor into research on revolutionary history. The merits and constraints of these two schools must be scrutinized within the context of the evolving landscape of contemporary French historiography.

关 键 词：马佐里克 孚雷 法国大革命传统史学 社会经济史 政治概念史 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]