检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯柳 刘晓杰 张志刚 王宏智 FENG Liu;LIU Xiaojie;ZHANG Zhigang;WANG Hongzhi(Department of Nuclear Medicine,the First Hospital of Jiaxing,Jiaxing 314000,Zhejiang,China;Department of Rheumatology and Immunology,the First Hospital of Jiaxing,Jiaxing 314000,Zhejiang,China)
机构地区:[1]嘉兴市第一医院核医学科,浙江嘉兴314000 [2]嘉兴市第一医院风湿免疫科,浙江嘉兴314000
出 处:《中国现代医生》2024年第29期33-36,共4页China Modern Doctor
基 金:浙江省嘉兴市级医学重点学科建设基金项目(2023-ZC-016)。
摘 要:目的分析肾脏深度不同估算公式与计算机断层扫描(computed tomography,CT)实测值的相关性及一致性,探讨适合本地区的最佳肾脏深度计算公式。方法回顾性分析2019年1月至2024年1月在嘉兴市第一医院进行肾动态显像成人患者213例的临床资料,获取同期腹部CT影像资料,记录患者的性别、年龄、体质量及身高,通过CT测量患者身体厚度及肾脏深度。利用7种估算公式(Tonnesen公式、李乾公式、Taylor公式、Inoue公式、Xue JJ公式、李氏方程及Ma G’S公式)计算双侧肾脏深度,将公式计算所得肾脏深度与CT实测值进行配对样本t检验、Pearson相关性分析和Bland-Altman一致性分析。结果7种估算公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测值间均存在相关性且所有计算值均低于CT实测值。相关性分析结果显示Ma G’S公式与CT实测值的相关系数高于其他公式。Tonnesen公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测值间的偏倚最大,Ma G’S公式计算肾脏深度与CT实测值间偏倚最小。结论Ma G’S公式引入身体厚度作为一个关键参考变量,相较于其他6种计算公式,在估算肾脏深度方面有更高的准确性和可靠性,在临床实践中具有更广泛的适用性。Objective To analyze the correlation and consistency between different kidney depth estimation formulas and computed tomography(CT)measurement of kidney depth,discussing the best kidney depth calculation formula for this region.Methods A total of 213 patients who underwent renal dynamic imaging in the First Hospital of Jiaxing from January 2019 to January 2024 were retrospectively included in this study.The abdominal CT image data of the same period were obtained,and the gender,age,height and weight were recorded.The patient’s body thickness and kidney depth were measured by CT.Seven calculation formulas(Tonnesen formula,Li Qian formula,Taylor formula,Inoue formula,Xue JJ formula,Li’s equation and Ma G’s formula)were used to estimate the kidney depth.Paired sample t-test,Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman consistency analysis were performed between the kidney depth calculated by the equation and the kidney depth measured by CT.Results There was a correlation between the estimated values calculated by the calculation formulas and actual CT measurements,and the kidney depth calculated by the seven formulas were lower than the CT measurements.The results of correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between Ma G’s formula and CT measurements was better than other formulas,and the correlation coefficients of Tonnesen formula and Inoue formula were consistent.The bias between the kidney depth calculated by Tonnesen formula and the CT measured value is the largest,and the bias between the kidney depth calculated by Ma G’s formula and the CT measured value is the smallest.Conclusion The Ma G’S formula introduces body thickness as a key reference variable for calculating kidney depth.Compared to the other six calculation formulas,it has demonstrated higher accuracy and reliability in estimating kidney depth,thereby having a broader applicability in clinical practice.
分 类 号:R445.5[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74