论数罪并罚原则的优化及其适用  

Optimization and Application of the Principle of Combined Punishment for Multiple Crimes

作　　者：何显兵[1] HE Xianbing(Law school of Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621050,China)

机构地区：[1]西南科技大学法学院,四川绵阳621050

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2024年第5期83-96,共14页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：现有数罪并罚原则的缺陷主要表现为有期徒刑、拘役与管制的并科导致刑罚轻重倒挂,财产刑的并科导致刑罚过重,不利于罪犯重返社会,以及多种并罚原则并存导致诸多疑难问题难以妥善解决。并科原则不符合刑罚追求报应与预防的双重目的,易导致刑罚丧失节俭性。基于明德慎罚的慎刑恤刑观,中国古代的数罪并罚以吸收原则为主,同时以赃罪并赃原则和限制加重原则为补充。当代数罪并罚宜采取吸收原则,并将数罪作为从重处罚的情节。这不仅符合刑罚目的与慎刑恤刑观念,而且可以消除司法实践中因多种并罚原则并存导致的法律适用难题。The current principle of combined punishment for multiple crimes has several shortcomings.The combination of fixed-term imprisonment,detention,and public surveillance can lead to a reversal of the severity of the punishment.The combination of property penalties may result in excessive punishment and hinder the reintegration of criminals into society.The coexistence of multiple principles makes it difficult to reach consensus on various complex issues.The principle of combined punishment does not fully achieve the dual purposes of retribution and prevention,and it lacks efficiency.Drawing from the ancient Chinese concept of bright virtue and careful punishment,the principle of combined punishment for multiple crimes primarily adopts the absorption principle,with the principle of limiting aggravation as a supplementary measure.The absorption principle should be applied in cases of combined punishment for several crimes,treating multiple crimes as circumstances for heavier punishment.This approach aligns with the purpose of punishment and can resolve the inconsistencies in legal application caused by the coexistence of multiple principles in judicial practice.

关 键 词：数罪并罚 并科原则 限制加重原则 吸收原则 

分 类 号：DF613[政治法律—刑法学]