检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张煜婕[1] Zhang Yujie
机构地区:[1]重庆大学,重庆400044
出 处:《上海行政学院学报》2024年第5期16-29,共14页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
基 金:2023年度重庆市社会科学规划博士和培育项目“积极老龄化视角下老年抑郁群体社会融合有效性评价及提升路径研究”(2023BS080)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:理想的社区共同体应体现广泛的公共参与,确保每位成员的声音得到充分尊重。当社区治理由少数成员主导时,其合法性与有效性便受到质疑。以S市为例,采用纵向民族志方法探讨如何解决这一问题。2021年之前,S市的关键社区决策常由少数成员单方面决定。2021年之后,通过将协商民主与社会工作方法相结合,社区开始整合全过程人民民主与生命政治的理论框架,以适度关联为中介,不仅提升了社区成员的广泛参与,还确保了社区成员在决策过程中的生命相关权益得到保障和维护,从而推动社区治理向最优解发展。通过适度关联迈向有效治理是社区共同体建构的关键逻辑。An ideal community is characterized by extensive public participation,ensuring that the voices of all members are adequately heard and respected.However,the legitimacy and effectiveness of community governance come under scrutiny when it is disproportionately influenced by a few core members.This study employs a longitudinal ethnographic approach to address these concerns,with City S serving as the primary case study.Prior to 2021,decision-making in key community areas of City S was often unilaterally executed by a select few.Post-2021,the community began integrating the principles of deliberative democracy with social work methodologies,thereby embedding the theoretical frameworks of whole-process people's democracy and biopolitics.Moderate connection served as a crucial intermediary in this integration,significantly boosting broad-based participation and ensuring the protection and recognition of community members'life-related rights within the decision-making process.This approach fostered the development of a model that aligns with the principles of optimal community governance.The findings demonstrate that leveraging moderate connection to achieve effective governance encapsulates the fundamental logic in constructing a robust community commonwealth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49