比较法视野下AIGC著作权赋权模式的类型化研究  

The Study on the Typification of AIGC Copyright Assignment Model from the Perspective of Comparative Law

作　　者：金丹 何佳 JIN Dan;HE Jia(Faculty of Law, Dalian University;School of Foreign Languages, Dalian Maritime University)

机构地区：[1]大连大学法学院 [2]大连海事大学外语学院

出　　处：《科学与社会》2024年第3期132-155,共24页Science and Society

摘　　要：人工智能生成物是否具有著作权,需要从权利识别与权利确认的角度进行分析。对人工智能生成物进行著作权赋权,是一种在探讨权利主体的认定标准、是否构成著作权法上的作品、平衡公益与私益的基础上,同时确定权利类型、权利内容与权利确认的过程。目前比较法上对于人工智能生成物著作权的权利归属认定存在一定分歧,主要可分为实体性独立赋权模式、溯源性权利归属模式、限定性权利承认模式和排他性权利否认模式四种,且总体倾向于由具体用户享有著作权。在我国法律中,关于人工智能生成物的规范则较为缺乏,在借鉴比较法经验的基础上需要对AIGC创作模式进行差异化分级判断,并引入相关登记制度,建立全过程争议解决机制,从而实现鼓励创新与破除垄断的平衡。Whether AIGCT has copyright needs to be analysed from the perspective of rights identification and rights confirmation.While exploring the criteria for identifying the subject of the right,whether it constitutes a work under the copyright law,and balancing public and private interests,the type of right,the content of the right and the way of confirming the right should be determined.At present,there are some differences in comparative law on the determination of the attribution of rights to AIGC copyright,which can be divided into four main modes:the substantive independent empowerment mode,the retroactive attribution of rights mode,the restrictive recognition of rights mode,and the exclusive denial of rights mode,and the general tendency is that the specific user enjoys the copyright.China's law on AIGC norms are relatively lacking,based on comparative law experience needs to be introduced into the relevant registration system,the establishment of the whole process of dispute resolution mechanism,so as to realize the balance of encouraging innovation and breaking monopoly.

关 键 词：人工智能生成物 创新激励 独创性 赋权模式 

分 类 号：DF07[政治法律—法学理论]