检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳江锋 谢京华[1] YUE Jiangfeng;XIE Jinghua(Beijing Institute of JEZETEK,Beijing 100085,China)
机构地区:[1]四川九洲电器集团有限责任公司北京研究院,北京100085
出 处:《现代防御技术》2024年第5期9-16,共8页Modern Defence Technology
摘 要:反无人机作战中涉及的手段丰富、装备复杂,需考虑的因素众多,致使对防御作战方案的综合评估及优化存在较大难度。鉴此,基于层次分析法开展的作战方案综合评估,在构建目标层、准则层和指标层等三层指标体系的基础上,结合专家调研和打分,构造判断矩阵,全面评估各级指标的权重向量,进而推算出各底层指标相对顶层目标的影响权重。在此基础上,借助军事仿真的手段得出底层指标的模拟值,结合其对应的影响权重,即可在不同作战方案间进行无量纲的对比评估,解决了由可测度较高的指标推导作战方案总体评估结论的难题,同时还可更好地发现对提升作战效能影响较大的因素,以及为高效优化作战方案找出更为现实可行的途径。There are abundant means and complex equipments involved in the anti-UAV operation,and many factors need to be considered,which makes the comprehensive evaluation and optimization of the combat schemes more difficult.Based on the analytic hierarchy process(AHP),the comprehensive evaluation of combat schemes is carried out on the basis of constructing a three-tier index system including the objective layer,criterion layer and index layer,combining with experts′investigation and scoring,constructing a judgment matrix,comprehensively evaluating the weight vector of indicators at all levels,and then calculating the influence weight of each base indicator relative to the top objective.Overall evaluation results of different combat schemes can be obtained according to the simulation results of anti-UAV swarm combat,their corresponding index weights and comparability.The problem of deriving overall evaluation conclusions of combat schemes from relatively measurable indicators can be solved.At the same time,factors that have a greater influence on improving combat effectiveness can be discovered more easily.And to find a more realistic and feasible way to optimize the operational plan efficiently.
分 类 号:E926.4[军事—军事装备学] TJ8[兵器科学与技术—武器系统与运用工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.149.185