1935年法币改革后暗记券纠纷的演化与调处  

Evolution and Adjustment of the Dispute over Secret Notes after the Legal Currency Reform in 1935

作　　者：郑成林 贾婷宇 Zheng Chenglin;Jia Tingyu

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学中国近代史研究所暨中国商会研究院

出　　处：《近代史学刊》2024年第2期193-208,M0009,共17页Journal of Modern Chinese History

摘　　要：1935年,国民政府实施法币改革,统一货币发行权,不许商业银行新发钞票,但已流通于市面者准其照常行使。因对政府政策的个性理解和维护自身权益的需要,发券银行与领券行庄对暗记券合约是否继续有效有不同的认知和态度,以致纠纷一时四起,乃至诉诸公堂,引起社会各界广泛关注。根据银行是否具备货币发行权,暗记券纠纷大致分为两类,但最终解决办法大同小异,即纠纷双方多在当地商人团体与商界领袖居中调处后重签协议而和解。暗记券纠纷的调处化解,对稳定金融市场和推进法币改革均产生了积极影响。After the legal currency reform in 1935,the state centralized the power of issuance and did not allow commercial banks to continue to issue banknotes,but those in circulation were allowed to be used as usual.Due to the deviation in the understanding of policies,the issuing banks and the coupon-receiving banks and firms had different perceptions and attitudes towards the validity of the established secret notes contracts,resulting in numerous disputes.Both sides engaged in a game around their respective interests and even resorted to the court,which attracted widespread attention from all sectors of society.Under the appeal and communication of the Shanghai Association of Banks,the National Government agreed to other banks to change the fiat currency to the three banks in accordance with the method of receiving secret notes.Other disputes are often resolved after mediation between business groups and business leaders,both parties agree to withdraw and re-sign the agreement.To some extent,this will help stabilize the financial market after the legal currency reform.

关 键 词：法币改革 暗记券 银行 钱庄 纠纷 

分 类 号：K26[历史地理—历史学] F82[历史地理—中国史]