档案行政复议的制度实践与路径优化  

The System Practice and Path Optimization of Archival Administrative Reconsideration

作　　者：张健[1] 王筱盈 Zhang Jian;Wang Xiaoying(School of Law,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang,Jiangsu 212013;School of Law,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444)

机构地区：[1]江苏大学法学院,江苏镇江212013 [2]上海大学法学院,上海200444

出　　处：《档案与建设》2024年第10期44-50,共7页Archives & Construction

基　　金：国家社科基金后期项目“社会治理法治化研究”(项目编号:23FTYB001)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：通过对1999年《中华人民共和国行政复议法》实施后的1200起案件样本的讨论发现,行政复议作为与行政诉讼相比肩的化解档案行政争议的法律渠道,在促进档案主管部门依法行政、实质性化解行政争议、维护公众合法权益等方面发挥了重要的作用。然而,当前档案行政复议制度仍存在作为化解争议主渠道的作用有待提升、监督与纠错作用有限,以及档案馆的角色定位有待明确、档案开放申请人缠讼现象较为严重等问题。未来应当以新修订的《中华人民共和国行政复议法》实施为契机,多措并举,不断完善档案行政复议制度,充分发挥档案行政复议制度在化解档案行政争议中的作用。Through a sample discussion of 1,200 cases after the implementation of the Administrative Reconsideration Law of the People's Republic of China in 1999,it was found that archival administrative reconsideration,as a legal channel for resolving administrative disputes in comparison with administrative litigation,has played an important role in promoting the lawful administration of archival authorities,substantially resolving administrative disputes,and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the public,and so on.However,the current archival administrative reconsideration system,as a main channel for resolving disputes,still needs to be enhanced in its functions,and its roles of supervision and error correction are limited.Moreover,the role of the archives needs to be clearly defined,and the problem of repeated malicious litigations made by applicants asking to open up the achieve(s)is relatively serious.In the future,we should take the implementation of the newly revised Administrative Review Law of the People's Republic of China as an opportunity to take measures to improve the archival administrative review system and give full play to the role of the archival administrative review system in solving the archival administrative disputes.

关 键 词：档案行政复议 《中华人民共和国行政复议法》 档案主管部门 权利救济 监督 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]