检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕文达 唐鹏[2] 王东昀 李林 王东坡[2] 闫帅星 LYU Wenda;TANG Peng;WANG Dongyun;LI Lin;WANG Dongpo;YAN Shuaixing(Lanzhou Railway Survey and Design Institute Co.,Ltd.,Lanzhou 730000,China;State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China)
机构地区:[1]兰州铁道设计院有限公司,甘肃兰州730030 [2]成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川成都610059
出 处:《防灾减灾工程学报》2024年第5期1041-1050,1061,共11页Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering
基 金:兰州铁道设计院有限公司科研项目(兰院科2022-02号);国家自然科学基金项目(42207232)资助。
摘 要:随着公路、铁路、城市立交桥的大量建设,跨线桥数量剧增,桥墩被汽车撞击的可能性大大增加。因此,针对目前铁路桥墩防车撞防护装置的不足,提出了一款泡沫铝基组合耗能装置的结构型式。该研究结合了静力压缩试验、落锤冲击试验以及有限元数值模拟,研究了防撞装置缓冲材料的物理力学性能及车辆撞击防撞装置的冲击动力学响应。结果表明,泡沫铝-聚氨酯-泡沫铝三层组合结构型式中工况3~4吸能效果最佳,其吸能密度(EA)、比吸能(SEA)以及吸能效率(EEA)值分别为3×10^(3) kJ/m^(3)、12.21 kJ/kg、28.57%。在数值模拟中,无防撞装置工况下,车辆撞击力最大值为5 332.99 kN,桥墩吸收的能量为22.05 kJ,最大应力为124.46 MPa,墩身产生明显损伤;在有防撞装置工况下,车辆撞击力最大值为2 674.41 kN,降低了49.85%;桥墩最大应力为6.96 MPa,降低了94.41%。结果表明该防撞装置组合结构对桥墩起到了良好的防护效果。With the large-scale construction of highways,railways and urban overpasses,the number of overpasses has increased sharply,significantly raising the risk of bridge piers being hit by vehicles.To address the shortcomings of current protective devices for railway bridge piers against vehicle collisions,a structural form of an aluminum foam-based energy dissipation device was proposed.This study combined static compression tests,drop hammer impact tests,and finite element numerical simulations to investigate the physical and mechanical properties of the buffer material in the anti-collision device and the dynamic impact response of the vehicle during collisions.The results showed that the three-layer aluminum foam-polyurethane-aluminum foam composite structure,under test conditions 3 and 4,achieved the best energy absorption performance.Its energy absorption density(EA),specific energy absorption(SEA),and energy absorption efficiency(EEA)values were 3×10^(3)kJ/m^(3),12.21kJ/kg,and 28.57%,respectively.In numerical simulations,without a protective device,the maximum vehicle impact force was 5332.99kN,the energy absorbed by the bridge pier was 22.05kJ,and the maximum stress was 124.46MPa,causing significant damage to the pier.With the protective device in place,the maximum vehicle impact force was 2674.41kN,a reduction of 49.85%;the maximum stress on the pier was 6.96MPa,a decrease of 94.41%.The results showed that this protective device provided excellent protection for bridge piers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7