检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张兴祥 杨子越[3] ZHANG Xingxiang;YANG Ziyue
机构地区:[1]厦门大学习近平经济思想教研中心,厦门361001 [2]厦门大学社会科学学部委员会,厦门361001 [3]厦门大学经济学院经济学系,厦门361001
出 处:《亚太经济》2024年第5期25-39,共15页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“习近平总书记关于推进新时代高水平对外开放重要论述研究”(22B KS139)。
摘 要:由金融资本集团主导的全球供应链体系,必然建立在不平等的基础之上,它是金融资本集团获利的关键,更是美国霸权得以维持的关键,同时也注定该体系不可持续。美国假国家权力之手塑造符合金融资本集团利益的全球供应链,使得供应链塑造超越经济范畴,呈现了硬实力、软实力、巧实力的综合作用,反映了政治与经济的相互嵌入。基于“币缘—地缘政治”“意识形态—国际话语”和“境外干涉—‘去国家化’”的博弈视角,对三种实力加以解构。研究发现,一方面,美国成功塑造并维持符合其利益要求的全球供应链的一些做法值得总结;另一方面,美国霸权导向的全球供应链体系及其暴露的问题亦需引以为鉴。The global supply chain system dominated by the financial capital group is inevitably built on the basis of inequality.It is the key to the profit of the financial capital group and even more so to the maintenance of the United States'hegemony,which is doomed to be unsustainable.The United States has used state power to shape the global supply chain in line with the interests of the financial capital group,which makes the supply chain shaping go beyond the economic domain,showing the integrated role of hard power,soft power and smart power and reflecting the mutual embedding of politics and economy.The article deconstructs the three powers based on the game perspectives of"currency-geopolitics","ideology-international discourse"and"extraterritorial intervention-'denationalisation'".The findings suggest that,on the one hand,it is worthwhile to take stock of some of the ways in which the United States has successfully shaped and sustained GSCs in line with its interests;on the other hand,it is important to draw lessons from the United States'hegemonically oriented global supply chain system and the problems it has exposed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171