移送审查起诉后职务犯罪监察证据配套适用规则研究  

Research on Supporting Applicable Rules of Supervisory Evidence of Job-Related Crimes after Transfer,Review and Prosecutionv

作　　者：王译 WANG Yi

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学学部,湖南湘潭411105 [2]湘潭大学纪检监察研究院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第5期101-112,共12页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家重点研发计划重点专项“智慧司法科学理论与司法改革科技支撑技术研究”(2020YFC0832400);湖南省社会科学基金青年项目“电子微腐败监察治理机制研究”(23YBQ055);湖南省教育厅党的二十大精神研究专项“在法治轨道上全面建设社会主义现代化国家研究”(23B1142)。

摘　　要：2018年《监察法》第33条概括性地规定了监察证据可作为刑事证据使用的依据,但并未严格区分职务违法和职务犯罪这两类情形。囿于“法法衔接”存在程序性质差异,监察证据移送起诉后的转换规则不同于侦查机关移送起诉的证据转换。为避免诉讼回转,监察证据仍应合乎实质性审查的基本要求,其与侦查、审查批捕和提起公诉的取证标准应保持一致。监察证据的实质性审查可借鉴大陆法系的检察官客观义务,对监察机关移送起诉证据的实质审查应从取证规范、证据资格和证据排除等方面形成必要的司法规制。在移送审查起诉前,职务犯罪监察证据应通过监察内部的案件审理监督实现证据筛查效果。围绕非法证据排除、意见证据、传闻证据和补强证据等传统规则,未来立法应建构监察证据转换刑事证据的实质性审查标准。Article 33 of the 2018 Supervision Law generally stipulated that supervisory evidence can serve as a basis for the use of criminal evidence,but does not strictly distinguish between duty violations and duty crimes.Due to the procedural differences in the“connection between laws and regulations”,and the conversion rules of supervisory evidence after being transferred to prosecution are different from those of investigation organs.In order to avoid litigation,the supervision evidence should still meet the basic requirements of substantive examination,and should be consistent with the evidence collection standards of investigation,review,arrest and prosecution.The substantive examination of supervisory evidence can draw lessons from the objective obligations of prosecutors in civil law system,and the substantive examination of prosecution evidence transferred by supervision organs should form necessary judicial regulations from the aspects of evidence collection norms,evidence qualification and evidence exclusion.Before being transferred for examination and prosecution,the evidence of duty crime supervision should be screened by monitoring the internal case trial supervision.Focusing on the traditional rules such as the exclusion of illegal evidence,opinion evidence,hearsay evidence and reinforcing evidence,the future legislation should construct the substantive examination standard for monitoring the transformation of evidence into criminal evidence.

关 键 词：监察证据 刑事诉讼 证据规则 实质审查 检察官客观义务 

分 类 号：D922.114.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]