霍菲尔德法律关系理论下的环境权解构  

Deconstruction of Environmental Rights in Hofield’s Theory of Legal Relations

作　　者：周旭 ZHOU Xu(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,Hubei,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期27-38,共12页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD138);湖南省教育厅重点项目(23A0054)。

摘　　要：作为分析法学的重要应用工具,霍菲尔德的法律关系理论以严谨的思辨性契合了环境权在属性、主体、权能范围、落实与前景方面的模糊与争议困境。综合既有的环境权探索成果,可以理想环境的生活权益、理想环境的享受权益、排除环境侵害的权益、排除环境破坏的权益、可持续利用的资源权益、获取环境信息的权益、参与环境维护与管理的权益、保护环境质量与承担损害责任的义务、维护代际利益的义务、主张与保障集体环境与资源利益的职责的解析为基本,并以生物权利、环境空间利益、环境权救济等落实问题为辅助,尝试形成既有环境权内容的完整逻辑体系,且在环境权的整体存在、整体实现等问题中得出分析结论。As an important application tool of analytical jurisprudence,Hofield̍s theory of legal relations fits the ambiguous and controversial dilemma of environmental rights in terms of attributes,subjects,scopes of power,implementation and prospects with its rigorously critical nature.It is of great likelihood to formulate a complete logical system of existing environmental rights and draw analytical conclusions from forward-looking issues such as the overall existence and overall implementation,based on the existing exploratory studies and aided by analyzing the following implementation problems.The existing acquired results include rights of ideal environment to live,ideal environment to enjoy,exclusion of environmental harm,exclusion of environmental damages,sustainable usage of resources,obtaining environment information,participation in environmental maintenance and management,obligation to protect environmental quality and assumed liability for damages;whereas the implementation problems may cover as biological interests,environmental space benefits and relief of environmental rights.

关 键 词：环境权 霍菲尔德 法律关系 落实 前景 救济 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]