检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵诗佳 Zhao Shijia(School of Public Administration,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《网络安全与数据治理》2024年第10期68-74,共7页CYBER SECURITY AND DATA GOVERNANCE
摘 要:当前公共数据开放多为无门槛向全社会开放原始数据,无法发挥公共数据的深层效益,基于此公共数据授权运营应运而生。然而,数据效益提升和个人隐私保护存在天然矛盾关系,公共数据授权运营很难将二者兼顾。基于公共数据授权运营的实践现状,运用制度分析与发展(IAD)框架,针对隐私保护和效益提升的两难困境进行深度剖析。最终从规范外部变量、完善行动舞台、优化相互作用三个方面总结纾困之道,得出隐私保护与效益提升的最优解。Currently,public data is mostly opened to the whole society as raw data without thresholds,failing to yield deep benefits.Thus,authorized operation of public data emerged.However,there′s a contradiction between data benefit improvement and personal privacy protection,making it hard to balance both.Based on the current practice situation of the authorized operation of public data,this paper uses IAD framework to conduct an in-depth analysis of the dilemma of privacy protection and benefit improvement.Finally,the solutions to the predicament are summarized from three aspects:regulating external variables,improving the action arena,and optimizing the interaction,and the optimal solution for privacy protection and benefit improvement is obtained.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51