检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵冲 黄宇琛 Zhao Chong;Huang Yuchen
机构地区:[1]福州大学建筑与城乡规划学院
出 处:《华中建筑》2024年第11期152-157,共6页Huazhong Architecture
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于基因图谱辨识的海丝沿线传统民居空间组织形式及其形成机理研究”(编号:52078135)。
摘 要:潮汕地区和闽南地区在民系的划分上同属闽海系,两地区具有相同的方言和相近的文化背景,民居建筑应呈现高度相似性。然而通过实地调研发现,两地区民居存在相似性的同时又存在差异。该文基于147栋两地区传统合院式民居实地调研,通过文献分析从两地区同属闽海系的地域文化背景出发,以类型梳理为逻辑对潮汕地区和闽南地区传统合院式民居的平面形制和大木构架类型进行了详细的比较研究,梳理共同的特征规律和存在的差异,并分析两地区传统合院式民居产生差异的内在原因。The Chaoshan region and the Minnan region both belong to the Minhai system in terms of ethnic division.The two regions share the same dialect and similar cultural background,and residential buildings should show a high degree of similarity.However,through field research,it was found that there are similarities as well as differences in the residential areas of the two regions.Based on a field survey of 147 traditional courtyard style houses in two regions,through literature analysis,starting from the regional cultural background of both regions belonging to the Minhai system,we conducted a detailed comparative study on the flat form and large wooden frame types of traditional courtyard style houses in the Chaoshan and Minnan regions by using type sorting as the logic.Then we sort out the common characteristics and differences,and analyze the internal reasons for the differences in traditional courtyard style houses in the two regions.
关 键 词:闽南地区 潮汕地区 传统合院式民居 平面类型 大木构架类型
分 类 号:TU241.5[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49