检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴翔[1] 邹小奕 DAI Xiang;ZOU Xiao-yi(Institute of Government Statistics and Big Data,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 211815,China)
机构地区:[1]南京审计大学政府统计与大数据研究院,江苏南京211815
出 处:《山西财经大学学报》2024年第10期89-99,共11页Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:在中国逐步从传统的“边境开放”向“境内开放”拓展的背景下,基于双向固定效应模型,探讨制度型开放和贸易成本协同的福利提升效应。研究发现:制度型开放与贸易成本的福利提升效应在东部地区、中工业化城市组别中表现得更显著;从制度型开放的不同维度来看,贸易便利化、金融开放创新及嵌入高水平自由贸易网络广度对贸易福利的促进效应更为显著,而嵌入自由贸易网络深度未产生显著作用。In the context of China gradually expanding from traditional“border openness”to“domestic openness”,this study used a two-way fixed-effects model to explore the welfare-enhancing effects of institutional openness and trade costs working together.The findings indicated that the welfare-enhancing effects of institutional openness and trade costs was more pronounced in the eastern regions and in cities with medium levels of industrialization.From different dimensions of institutional openness,the promotion effects on trade welfare was more significant with trade facilitation,financial openness and innovation,and the breadth of embedding in highlevel free trade networks,while the depth of embedding in free trade networks innovation didn’t produce a significant effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.136.17.118