陶渊明《归去来兮辞》与莱昂修士《隐居颂》中自然书写的比较  

A Comparison of Natural Writing in Going Home of Tao Yuanming and Ode to Withdrawn Life of Fray Luis de León

作　　者：李翠蓉[1] LI Cuirong(Center for Latin American Studies,Guizhou University of Finance and Economics,Guiyang 550025,Guizhou,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州财经大学拉丁美洲研究中心,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《西南科技大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第5期39-44,共6页Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目:中国古典文学在西班牙语世界的传播研究,项目编号:17CZW038。

摘　　要：自然书写一直是诗歌批评的重要主题,也是中西比较诗学常见的切入点,但诗歌中的自然并不孤立存在,自然是诗人眼中的自然,“物我关联”才是深刻剖析中西自然书写异同的关键。本文选择中国隐逸诗之宗《归去来兮辞》与西班牙隐逸诗经典《隐居颂》作为比较对象,从自然意象、物我互动与隐逸缘由三个方面展开比较,以物我关系、物我神关系的对照为内核,呈现中西诗歌自然书写的差异以及由此折射出不同的人与自然的关系。Nature writing has always been an important theme of poetry criticism,and it is also a common entry point of Chinese and Western comparative poetics.However,in poetry,nature does not exist in isolation.Nature is the nature in the eyes of the poet.“The relationship between nature and me”is the key to a deep analysis of the similarities and differences between Chinese and Western nature writing.This article chooses the Chinese classic hermit poem Going Home and the Spanish classic hermit poem Ode to Withdrawn Life as the objects of comparison,and compares them from three aspects:the nature image,the interaction between nature and poet,and the causes of seclusion.With the comparison and contrast of the relationship between nature,the poet and God as the core,the paper presents the differences between the nature writing of Chinese and Western poetry and the different relationship between man and nature.

关 键 词：《归去来兮辞》 《隐居颂》 自然书写 物我 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]