非法出版犯罪的再类型化分析  

Analysis of the Re-typification of Illegal Publishing Activities

作　　者：梁泽 LIANG Ze(Law School,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210000,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,南京210000

出　　处：《江苏工程职业技术学院学报》2024年第3期108-112,共5页Journal of Jiangsu College of Engineering and Technology

摘　　要：当前,学界对非法出版犯罪的定罪思路主要采取二元论的观点:将非法出版犯罪类型化为形式违法与内容违法两种。二元论的观点存在从内容到程序的逻辑顺序不当、内容与程序的区分标准不明确、未能反映刑法与前置法的关系等不足之处。刑法具有前置法从属性,依据行为违反的前置法的不同,可以将非法出版犯罪再类型化为3种,即违反民事权利性规定的非法出版犯罪、违反行政禁止性规定的非法出版犯罪和违反行政控制性规定的非法出版犯罪。这种再类型化的方法揭示了非法出版行为构成犯罪的本质,并能够促使侵犯著作权罪回归以版权权利人为中心,实现前置法与刑法的有效协调。Presently,the determination of illegal publishing activities in academic circles is mainly made from the perspective of dualism,by which such crimes are categorized into unlawful forms and unlawful content.However,the belief in dualism has led to many problems including improper logical order between content and procedure,unclear standards for distinguishing content from procedure,and failure to clarify the relationship between criminal law and preliminary laws.Because criminal law is subordinate to preliminary laws,illegal publishing activities can be further classified into three types:violation of civil rights,violation of administrative prohibition,and violation of administrative control.This re-typification method helps to reveal the criminal nature of the illegal publishing activities,and ensures that copyright owners are the key to determining copyright infringement crimes,thereby realizing the effective coordination between preliminary laws and criminal law.

关 键 词：非法出版 行政从属性 前置法 民刑衔接 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]