检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宝友[1] 谭旭睿 杨玉香[1] 孟丽君[1] ZHANG Baoyou;TAN Xurui;YANG Yuxiang;MENG Lijun(China Jiliang University,Hangzhou 310018)
机构地区:[1]中国计量大学,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《财贸研究》2024年第10期17-30,共14页Finance and Trade Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“标准驱动的物流业高质量发展机理、路径及微观激励政策研究”(21BJY195)。
摘 要:基于技术异质性框架,构建包含非期望产出的共同前沿-SBM-DEA模型,测算2012—2020年间中国八大城市群物流标准化两阶段效率,并分析影响效率损失的外部环境与内部企业管理等因素。研究发现:在共同前沿下,中国城市群物流标准化两阶段效率值分别为0.65和0.40,分别有35%和60%的提升空间。无效率值分解发现,总体和高、中质量城市群两阶段效率损失主要来源于管理无效率,而低质量城市群两阶段效率损失包含了技术无效率和管理无效率两方面。在效率影响因素中,FDI和企业创新氛围显著减少物流标准化两阶段的效率损失,知识产权保护只对物流标准制定阶段的效率损失减小有正向作用,政府科技支持、政府环境治理费用、金融环境、消化吸收能力只对物流标准实施阶段效率损失下降起正向作用,政府污染处罚对物流标准化两阶段效率损失均无影响。Based on a technological heterogeneity framework,this study constructs a common frontier-SBM-DEA model incorporating undesirable outputs to measure the two-stage efficiency of logistics standardization across eight major urban agglomerations in China from 2012 to 2020.Furthermore,it analyzes external environmental factors and internal enterprise management issues that contribute to efficiency loss.The findings indicate that,under a common frontier,the two-stage efficiency values of logistics standardization in China’s urban agglomerations are 0.65 and 0.40,with potential improvement spaces of 35%and 60%respectively.Decomposition of inefficiency values reveals that the efficiency loss in both stages for overall high-quality and medium-quality urban agglomerations mainly stems from management inefficiency,while in low-quality urban agglomerations,efficiency loss is attributed to both technical and management inefficiency.Among the influencing factors,FDI and an atmosphere of enterprise innovation significantly reduce efficiency loss in the two stages of logistics standardization.Intellectual property protection has a positive effect only on reducing efficiency loss in the logistics standard-setting stage.Meanwhile,government support for technology,environmental governance expenditure,financial environment,and absorptive capacity positively affect efficiency loss reduction in the logistics standard implementation stage.Government pollution penalties,however,show no impact on efficiency loss in either stage of logistics standardization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200